#Weekend #homework
Will post few
#52W high or near #52W High ,
#ATH stock in this thread
#strength
#momentum
#Blacksmith #stocks to watch

@YouTube

#52W high count
Increase in numbers
#Compare
So 69 around increase
500+ stock 72
around 40% contribution from 100+ priced stock

filter you stock in better way now
#Trend
in Jan we had 400 + stock
and now we are close to it
🧐
#Graphs
#Adani Enterprise
What next dont know
but ride the strong trend
1720/1791 next fibo level
1586 can be demand zone

More from Anand Luhar

More from Adanient

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x