Alex1Powell Categories Government
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
Kaspersky speaks on US government ban and a closed Russian internet | ZDNet
🤔🤙
https://t.co/AMPtjUBKgE
2017-
Trump signs into law U.S. government ban on Kaspersky Lab software | Reuters
May 2019-
Kaspersky Lab Joins Forces with SolarWinds to Help MSPs Deliver Automated Cybersecurity Protection to Customers
Sept. -2019
U.S. Finalizes Rule Banning Kaspersky Products From Government Contracts
🤔🤙
https://t.co/AMPtjUBKgE
2017-
Trump signs into law U.S. government ban on Kaspersky Lab software | Reuters
May 2019-
Kaspersky Lab Joins Forces with SolarWinds to Help MSPs Deliver Automated Cybersecurity Protection to Customers
Sept. -2019
U.S. Finalizes Rule Banning Kaspersky Products From Government Contracts
I need to know more about the interest in medieval and classical history in the trump white house. /1
2) Today the WH issued a proclamation of commemoration of the 850th anniversary of the death of St. Thomas Beckett.
3) It's quite a document. "Becket’s death serves as a powerful and timeless reminder to every American that our freedom from religious persecution is not a mere luxury or accident of history, but rather an essential element of our liberty...bought with the blood of martyrs."
4) I am reasonably sure that Donald Trump is not a Peter O'Toole fan; and while he and T.S. Eliot would have gotten along in their fascism and antisemitism, I doubt he's read that either. And we can't always just say STEPHEN MILLER! ... can we?
5) Then there was the appointment of Milo's medievalist to a board that oversees cultural exchange and is tasked with stopping illicit artifact trade. Which is an important board but also a weird position.
2) Today the WH issued a proclamation of commemoration of the 850th anniversary of the death of St. Thomas Beckett.
3) It's quite a document. "Becket’s death serves as a powerful and timeless reminder to every American that our freedom from religious persecution is not a mere luxury or accident of history, but rather an essential element of our liberty...bought with the blood of martyrs."
4) I am reasonably sure that Donald Trump is not a Peter O'Toole fan; and while he and T.S. Eliot would have gotten along in their fascism and antisemitism, I doubt he's read that either. And we can't always just say STEPHEN MILLER! ... can we?
5) Then there was the appointment of Milo's medievalist to a board that oversees cultural exchange and is tasked with stopping illicit artifact trade. Which is an important board but also a weird position.
Of fuck no. pic.twitter.com/VTyLMsYfqI
— David M. Perry (@Lollardfish) December 23, 2020
Get ready for a load of spin about how the government's "Jet Zero" strategy allows them to do this and remain compatible with their climate goals. Jet Zero is a Trojan horse to expand aviation while promising change and it'll be too late to stop it when very little happens.
We've seen exactly the same from MPs of a certain colour regarding the expansion of Southampton Airport runway. Our own MP even claimed it was necessary to support British Airways families. AFAIK there are no BA families here: Literally throwing constituents under the (air)bus.
It's worth reading this debate in Hansard to see what is going on.
Want to see a textbook example of churnalism?
Here is a press release from the local business lobbying organisation of which the airport is a member: https://t.co/UGUssnUyj7
Here is the same thing reheated in the local press with a reporter's name on it:
Here we go...
BREAKING: HEATHROW VERDICT
— Plan B Earth (@PlanB_earth) December 15, 2020
I am breaking the court embargo on Heathrow to protest against the injustice of the verdict, which is a betrayal of the younger generation and those on the frontline of the crisis in the UK and around the world:https://t.co/R0nx4RazXF
We've seen exactly the same from MPs of a certain colour regarding the expansion of Southampton Airport runway. Our own MP even claimed it was necessary to support British Airways families. AFAIK there are no BA families here: Literally throwing constituents under the (air)bus.
It's worth reading this debate in Hansard to see what is going on.
Want to see a textbook example of churnalism?
Here is a press release from the local business lobbying organisation of which the airport is a member: https://t.co/UGUssnUyj7
Here is the same thing reheated in the local press with a reporter's name on it:
Here we go...
Supreme Court lifts ban on Heathrow third runway https://t.co/NdCdPnn8Cf
— BBC Business (@BBCBusiness) December 16, 2020
THREAD: Is the Govt changing its cherrypicking strategy on child poverty claims?
SPOT THE DIFFERENCE
1. What PM wrongly claimed on child poverty in 2019, earning @StatsRegulation rebuke
2. What PM claimed on child poverty at PMQs on 18 Nov 20
In the first statement, the PM used 2010 as a baseline. At the time, relative poverty was rising and absolute poverty was historically weak - we could not see where the 400,000 claim had come from.
An earlier thread on the PM's past claims
In the PMQs claim he talks about the last 10 yrs.
If he means since 2010, he'd be repeating his incorrect claim.
Does he mean the last 10 years for which we have statistics?
That would be starting at 2009/10 - under LAB & well before benefit cuts started to bite from 2012
Let's take a look, first, at the relative child poverty measure
Looking at the last 10 years, child poverty has RISEN by 200,000 (BHC) or 300,000 (BHC)
Can the PM's 400,000 claim be borne out by the absolute child poverty stats? Remember, we normally expect this figure to fall, as society gets richer
No, absolute child poverty fell by 100,000 on both BHC/AHC - a historically weak performance
SPOT THE DIFFERENCE
1. What PM wrongly claimed on child poverty in 2019, earning @StatsRegulation rebuke
2. What PM claimed on child poverty at PMQs on 18 Nov 20
In the first statement, the PM used 2010 as a baseline. At the time, relative poverty was rising and absolute poverty was historically weak - we could not see where the 400,000 claim had come from.
An earlier thread on the PM's past claims
THREAD:
— Imran (@imran_1) July 30, 2020
How can PM level up the country if he cannot level with the public about how many children are in poverty?
That's the question we should be asking ourselves after the @StatsRegulation ruled the PM incorrectly used child poverty statistics.
In the PMQs claim he talks about the last 10 yrs.
If he means since 2010, he'd be repeating his incorrect claim.
Does he mean the last 10 years for which we have statistics?
That would be starting at 2009/10 - under LAB & well before benefit cuts started to bite from 2012
Let's take a look, first, at the relative child poverty measure
Looking at the last 10 years, child poverty has RISEN by 200,000 (BHC) or 300,000 (BHC)
Can the PM's 400,000 claim be borne out by the absolute child poverty stats? Remember, we normally expect this figure to fall, as society gets richer
No, absolute child poverty fell by 100,000 on both BHC/AHC - a historically weak performance