Mr. Rosen has guided numerous initiatives, including an antitrust review of online technology platforms, criminal and civil opioids enforcement and legislation, investigations and prosecutions of IP theft and of cyberhacking,
AG Rosen move to the acting is very interesting and could be the final move in Trumps decision to use the 2018 Executive Order.
We know. All the DOD moves that took the team that uncovered spying against Trump and deputized them in the DOD.
Mr. Rosen has guided numerous initiatives, including an antitrust review of online technology platforms, criminal and civil opioids enforcement and legislation, investigations and prosecutions of IP theft and of cyberhacking,
https://t.co/w0gCpBrvv8
So that to say he’s getting things done. Much more interesting. The civil antitrust lawsuit against google
Announcement of Charges and Arrests in Computer Intrusion Campaigns Related to China
https://t.co/Qqne83eHgV
Malign Foreign Influence in U.S. Elections Presented at Center for Strategic and International Studies
https://t.co/ab5KorTAu0
He mentioned the Clinton campaign vulnerability to foreign government to influence her.
We do, however, continue to see malign foreign influence efforts relevant to the 2020 presidential election.
Donague served as JAG in The ARMY
he was a Military Magistrate Judge, Prosecutor, Defense Counsel, and Contract Litigator. He also served in the 82nd Airborne Division
Who served as the Office’s National Security Cyber Specialist and its representative on the Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council.
More from Trump
Allow me to offer some commentary on several SCOTUS cases that are NOT the #moab, but which, considered in aggregate, will reveal my impressions on the #TRUMPSMASH #lawOfFunny
Can someone give me a google number or something? I want a party line.
https://t.co/SlJCsjWMUa
I'm sorry, but #lawOFFunny #nominologicaldeterminism.
#thomists
This one is important:
Can someone give me a google number or something? I want a party line.
https://t.co/SlJCsjWMUa
We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 9, 2020
I'm sorry, but #lawOFFunny #nominologicaldeterminism.
#thomists
This one is important:
TS = 4:40 pm
Drop 1640: https://t.co/2xyG4PqvH9
Pic of Last bread = Previous Drop
Drop 1639:
SEC TEST
SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission
Sec
EDGAR:
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval
"Purpose" ?
increase the efficiency and accessibility of corporate filings
KEY WORD -> accessibility
"EDGAR has greatly decreased the time it takes for corporate documents to become publicly available"
Available to who ?
Public + who more specifically?
White Hats, POTUS etc. ?
Drop 1640: https://t.co/2xyG4PqvH9
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 28, 2020
Pic of Last bread = Previous Drop
Drop 1639:
SEC TEST
SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission
Sec
EDGAR:
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval
"Purpose" ?
increase the efficiency and accessibility of corporate filings
KEY WORD -> accessibility
"EDGAR has greatly decreased the time it takes for corporate documents to become publicly available"
Available to who ?
Public + who more specifically?
White Hats, POTUS etc. ?
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
“We don’t negotiate salaries” is a negotiation tactic.
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
"we don't negotiate salaries" really means "we'd prefer to negotiate massive signing bonuses and equity grants, but we'll negotiate salary if you REALLY insist" https://t.co/80k7nWAMoK
— Aditya Mukerjee, the Otterrific \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@chimeracoder) December 4, 2018
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]
