The only BREAKOUT scanner that I use day in and out...

for both LONG TERM BREAKOUTS and...

POSITIONAL TRADES based on the CCI Indicator🤓

Ready to learn how I use it?

Let's go🧵...

1⃣ Since the scanners are based on CCI, let's learn what's CCI first 👇

The most important diagnostic tool for me that signals turning point in stocks. It’s very simple to understand, so give it a try after watching the video.

https://t.co/zJNTxD1aa6
2⃣ The LONG TERM breakout scanner which is based on the weekly timeframe is simple and can be used to identify

- Positional trades
- Multibagger Ideas (don't forget to check the rules in 3)
3⃣ Rules to find LONG TERM breakouts👇
4⃣ Watch the details in this video as to how to use this LONG TERM breakout scanner.

CCI based breakout scanner to identify swing trades/positional trades/investment ideas. With some effort you can find the next potential multibagger!

https://t.co/Jnum1soExp
5⃣ The SHORT TERM breakout scanner based on daily is even simpler and can be used to identify

- Swing trades
- Positional trades
6⃣ Rules to find SHORT TERM breakouts 👇

Tell me what's the difference in LONG TERM & SHORT TERM - though minor can be very useful!
7⃣ Watch the details in this video as to how to use this SHORT TERM breakout scanner.

https://t.co/Jnum1soExp
8⃣ Now that you've watched the video and understood the rules here is the scanner link itself 😃

If you want me to make a thread on how I use the reversal scanner let me know in the comments!

https://t.co/KfKc7V0nGD
9⃣ If you've read still here don't forget to watch this video where I explain how to increase conviction in picking and holding stocks👇

https://t.co/O9phWlyUYZ
Learnt something? If yes, please👇

1. Retweet the first tweet https://t.co/hnkOkTV4GP
2. Follow @dmdsplyinvestor
3. Subscribe to my YouTube channel for more content! https://t.co/yNCTzHWpi6

More from Trendline Investor

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x