All-in-one chart that has everything you need to about trading cash stocks!
- How to enter
- How to define stop loss
- When to pyramid
- When to exit
Focus on big base breakouts & if this works even for 30-40% of your trades, you will make decent returns!
Retweet if you❤️it!

More from Trendline Investor
#ANGELONE being the strongest among the #broking stocks has taken off!
Which one would be the next?
#StocksToBuy https://t.co/zaAfCtOkJ6
Which one would be the next?
#StocksToBuy https://t.co/zaAfCtOkJ6

I think it is just about time for #broking stocks to \U0001f680!
— Trendline Investor (@dmdsplyinvestor) April 4, 2022
- #AngelOne looks the strongest & near ATH
- #Isec near major trendline support, forming Dojis on weekly
- #Motilalofs near major trendline supports, forming Dojis on monthly
All three low-risk setups!#stockideas pic.twitter.com/xB3Tm9jSou
More from Trading guides
Watched a Brilliant Video on Powerplay Trades by @TraderLion_ @RichardMoglen featuring Mark Ritchie
Here is a compilation of past PowerPlay Trades in the Indian Markets I have tried to analyse and study (taken minimum stock advance of 75%)
Taken some past trades of @iManasArora @iArpanK @RahulKhemka16 to analyse these kind of setups
YouTube video link:
https://t.co/Oaau7X7CkG
Here is a compilation of past PowerPlay Trades in the Indian Markets I have tried to analyse and study (taken minimum stock advance of 75%)
Taken some past trades of @iManasArora @iArpanK @RahulKhemka16 to analyse these kind of setups
YouTube video link:
https://t.co/Oaau7X7CkG

You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?