Long, VERY LONG thread👇👇👇:

1- Reflections on yesterday’s storming of the Capitol, and the responsibility borne by the sensationalist inflammatory indecent dishonest Media of the 21st century for those events, their clones, their antecedents, and their aftermath.

2- To be fair, 21st century media are stuck between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand they suffer a paucity of old-style journalists & beat-reporters; on the other hand they face stiff competition & “news” overkill from new forms of media, what the French call GAFTA;
3- that is to say Google Apple Facebook Twitter Amazon and 24-hour news channels etc.) Thus the Media today are no more than glittering (that is to say cheap vulgar bling bling) platforms for sensationalism, scoops, “citizen journalism,” oversimplifications, jingles, slogans,
4- punchlines, shock-jock “fast-food” type of opinion (not to say opinionated) journalism and talk-show-type “reporting” at the expense of substantive probing investigative journalism and transmission of knowledge.
5- In this world of superficiality, where the “honor” of being a journalist (or for that matter a cognoscenti) is given to those who don’t deserve it, EVERYONE becomes an expert, a pundit, an analyst, an interpreter, a philosopher…
6- This, in a sense, is “goodbye" to true researchers and specialists who spend a lifetime in archives, laboratories, reading rooms, and the field (what journalists call “the beat”) honing their skills, scouring archives, reading, decorticating, interpreting, ruminating, and
7- doubting themselves a million times in meditation before reaching “discernment” and shooting their mouths. We live unfortunately in societies saturated in people imbued in certitude, with no place left for reading, reflecting, analyzing, and ultimately coming out with the
8- (very human) sense of humility and admission that one cannot possibly know everything, that as humans and non-specialists and general audiences (and simply human beings) we are unavoidably ignorant of many subjects. We cannot possibly know everything!!!
9- To reuse Bertrand Russell’s apt adage "The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” So there you have it! That’s where dwells the problem; the origin of our debility as “news consumers”
10- (and note the term “news consumers,” NOT “readers.”) Our problem, and MY PROBLEM with the Media (ALL MEDIA, chief among them the so-called “media of record”) issue from this obscene world of “ready-made” “one-size-fits-all” “prefab” lapidary peremptory thought
11-dispensed by @ABC @BBC @GeorgeStephanopoulos @NYTimes @CNN @JakeTapper @FoxNews and the omnipresent Social Media types brimming with “experts” looking for validation, instant gratification and recognition w/ “ThumbsUp” “ThumbsDown” “Like” “unLike" “Friend” “Cancel” “unFriend”
12- The problem is also, as mentioned earlier, with consumption & consumerism. Note the modern (Woke) adage of “Consuming Media” rather than “Reading” and/or “What have you read lately, and what did you think of it.” That’s what the modern world expects of us:
13- Performance. Airtime. Quantity as opposed to quality. And in that sense, admitting “ignorance” on certain topics, or approaching questions alien to us with humility & honest recognition that we manifestly do not know much about them (or do not know anything at all about them)
14- is viewed as a deficit, a failing, rather than a normal human quality. Thus, humans become “losers,” on Twitter and the rest, because, you know, the authority today is dispensed by the likes of @GeorgeStephanopoulos and @TuckerCarlson and @JakeTapper…
15- This is all an issue of cause and effect. Journalists don’t practice their trade anymore. And philosophers and historians and scientists have become media sensations, influencers in modern lingo. And yet, discernment & knowledge are the result of a long process of maceration,
16- advancing at a glacial pace. It is impossible for us to know everything. It is impossible for us to have all the answers immediately (we may of course always Google or Wiki, but then you’ll have a Google or Wiki (quicky) authority, not your own probing and studying
17- and reading and reflecting and trial and error etc., leading to illumination the old fashioned way.) Today, everybody is an epidemiologist, and environmentalist, a Middle East expert, an American-politics pundit, a legal scholar, a Constitutional lawyer...
18- I retch at the thought of 100s of millions getting knowledge (“consuming knowledge” to use a Woke term) from @Twitter @NYTimes @CNN and the rest. How about some Socratic humility for a change? Like Bertrand Russell, being wary of people full of certitude may be a good place
19- to start. We should be capable of accepting that there are certain things that we don’t know, that we need to investigate, study, mull over, ponder, reflect upon, learn about, slowly, cautiously, deliberately, with circumspection and patience, but also with humility.
20- That’s what intellectual honesty is all about: recognizing our ignorance! Ignorance NOT as permanent failing, but as human quality; a deficit that we aim to correct, through research & careful study & reflection.
Now back to News and Knowledge “consumption” on Social Media.

More from Society

So, as the #MegaMillions jackpot reaches a record $1.6B and #Powerball reaches $620M, here's my advice about how to spend the money in a way that will truly set you, your children and their kids up for life.

Ready?

Create a private foundation and give it all away. 1/

Let's stipulate first that lottery winners often have a hard time. Being publicly identified makes you a target for "friends" and "family" who want your money, as well as for non-family grifters and con men. 2/

The stress can be damaging, even deadly, and Uncle Sam takes his huge cut. Plus, having a big pool of disposable income can be irresistible to people not accustomed to managing wealth.
https://t.co/fiHsuJyZwz 3/

Meanwhile, the private foundation is as close as we come to Downton Abbey and the landed aristocracy in this country. It's a largely untaxed pot of money that grows significantly over time, and those who control them tend to entrench their own privileges and those of their kin. 4

Here's how it works for a big lotto winner:

1. Win the prize.
2. Announce that you are donating it to the YOUR NAME HERE Family Foundation.
3. Receive massive plaudits in the press. You will be a folk hero for this decision.
4. Appoint only trusted friends/family to board. 5/

You May Also Like

1/ Some initial thoughts on personal moats:

Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.

Characteristics of a personal moat below:


2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.

As Andrew Chen noted:


3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized

Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than


4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.

After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.

5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.

In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.