NODEEP KAUR, our sister, who represents the best of us, is a 24 year old Sikh woman and Dalit majdoor rights activist who was actively working for majdoor rights and farmers protest since day one of this movement. She is in jail for more than 20 days now. (1/5)

She has been physically and sexually assaulted, her bail has been rejected by the court.

Nodeep Kaur, needs our support, let's stand for her, for women’s rights, for dalit rights, for majdoor rights, for farmers rights, and for sikh rights.
(2/5)
Nodeep has been tortured and beaten up by the police. Male police officers have sexually assaulted her. While Nodeep is being brutally assaulted at Karnal Jail, a threat hovers around the workers of the Kundli Industrial Area.

Her bail plea was rejected yesterday. (3/5)
Sexual violence against women, specifically with regards to dalit women is an epidemic in India. It is the state's way of maintaining dominance over the dalits - a group of people who were considered as 'untouchables' in India's regressive caste system. (4/5)
Nodeep used her voice to speak against this epidemic. She is a beacon of light. Lots and lots of prayers for Nodeep Kaur’s safety and release. In solidarity with Nodeep Kaur.

Use your platforms to bring light to Nodeep Kaur.

#NodeepKaur (5/5)
credit towards @KaurCollective
IG: kaur_collective
#ReleaseNodeepKaur #NodeepKaur
#ReleaseNodeepKaur #JusticeForNodeepKaur #NodeepKaur

More from Society

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?