#Nationalists
In 70 years, Hindus didn't understand that a family made India a Muslim nation. But in 5 years, Muslims understood that Modi was creating a Hindu nation.
Country was cut into 2 pieces, but no sound came from anywhere. Half Kashmir gone, no noise?
1/9

Tibet went, there was no rebellion?
Wounds like reservation, emergency, Tashkent, Shimla, Sindhu were given, but no one cared
2G, Coal, CWG, Augusta Westland, Bofors like blur but no noise
Veto power was given to china, no train were stopped.
2/9
Brave heart like Lal Bahadur Shastri was lost, no candle was lit and nobody demanded a CBI inquiry
Leaders like Madhavrao, Rajesh Pilot were killed, made no difference
But as soon as beef was stopped, the catastrophe ensued
3/9
As soon as the national anthem was made compulsory, unhappiness followed
When asked to say #VandeMataram or #BharatMataKiJai, their tongues got stitched
Demonetization and GST made them dance in anger
Best efforts were made to make Aadhar into niradhar
4/9
No one felt pain for #KashmirPandits who became refugees in their own country
Rohingyas are causing pain for Muslims.
Congress has made Hindus Namard
5/9
50,000 temples closed or demolished in Kashmir due to terrorism will be opened or built - Union Minister Kishan Reddy
Good news, but 50,000? Hearing this figure, my mind numbed
Stones on window of Church or Mosque, Media will cry foul for weeks
6/9
But not few, but 50,000 temples were closed... didn't any Hindu know about it?
Forcibly drive away Hindus from the valley, then eradicate every sign of Hinduism,
Think how big a conspiracy it was... To destroy a religion from root of whole valley?
7/9
If Modi hadn't come, no one would have known this! Why did leftist journalists, Muslim intellectuals and Congress never put this issue before the country?
Seems whole plan was going on like an intrigue and so peacefully that we didn't even know…
8/9
Think about it...
9/9

More from Religion

🌿𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 : 𝑫𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒗𝒂 & 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒏𝒖

Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W


Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela


The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.


One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.


Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"
Assalam Alaiki dear Sister in Islam. I hope this meets you well. Hope you are keeping safe in this pandemic. May Allah preserve you and your beloved family. I would like to address the misconception and misinterpretation in your thread. Please peruse the THREAD below.


1. First off, a disclaimer. Should you feel hurt by my words in the course of the thread, then forgive me. It’s from me and not from Islam. And I probably have to improve on my delivery. And I may not quote you verbatim, but the intended meaning would be there. Thank You!

2. Standing on Imam Shafii’s quote: “And I never debated anyone but that I did not mind whether Allah clarified the truth on my tongue or his tongue” or “I never once debated anyone hoping to win the debate; rather I always wished that the truth would come from his side.”

3. Okay, into the meat (my love for meat is showing. Lol) of the thread. Even though you didn’t mention the verse that permitted polygamy, everyone knows the verse you were talking about (Q4:3).


4. Your reasons for the revelation of the verse are strange. The first time I came across such. I had to quickly consult the books on the exegeses or tafsir of the Quran written by renowned specialists!
#Ramayana #LecturesOnTheRamayana

In the past, we had a glimpse of Lakshmana's devotion towards Sri Rama, his brother and father figure.

However, it is interesting to note his unique relationship with Sita, especially as seen by from her perspective.

Thread below

1/

We all know about the Golden Deer / Maricha incident and the way Sita influences Lakshmana to go in search of his brother.

Personally, I am unable to get 2 strong emotional points in one thread and hence, I will skip this incident for today.

2/

In Sundara Kanda, when Hanuman meets Sita, she says the following

सिंहस्कन्धो महाबाहुर्मनस्वी प्रियदर्शिनः।
पितृवद्वर्तते रामे मातृवन्मां समाचरन्।।

Lakshmana, who has lionshoulders and strong arms, who is handsome, who takes Rama as his father & treats me as his own mother

3/

ह्रियमाणां तदा वीरो न तु मां वेद लक्ष्मणः।
वृद्धोपसेवी लक्ष्मीवान् शक्तो न बहुभाषिता।।

Heroic Lakshmana, did not know while I was borne away. He is prosperous, foremost in serving elders. He is energetic and reserved in his speech like my father-in-law ..

4/

He is a prince dear (to his brother).

These are from Sarga-38, shlokas 60 and 61.

There are 3 distinct points which I want to draw the attention of the reader to.

1. She also compares Lakshmana to Dasaratha much like how Rama did when he constructed the hut in panchavati

5/

You May Also Like