#RadicoKhaitan - Concall Snippet !

ROCE GENERATION of 20-25% In Coming Qtrs !

(Weekend Is Coming๐Ÿ˜) https://t.co/vQw9N2UFgZ

More from Raghav Chaudhary

More from Radico

You May Also Like

(1) Kushner is worth $324 million.
(2) Since 2016, Kushner has connived, with Saudi help, to force the Qataris (literally at a ship's gunpoint) to "loan" him $900 million.
(3) This is consistent with the Steele dossier.
(4) Kushner is unlikely to ever have to pay the "loan" back.


2/ So as you read about his tax practices, you should take from it that it's practices of this sort that ensure that he's able to extort money from foreign governments while Trump is POTUS without ever having to pay the money back. It also explains why he's in the Saudis' pocket.

3/ It's why the Saudis *say* he's in their pocket. It's why emoluments and federal bribery statutes matter. It's why Kushner was talking to the Saudi Crown Prince the day before the murdered Washington Post journalist was taken. It's why the Trump administration now does nothing.
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! ๐Ÿ‘‡

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
โ€ข Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
โ€ข Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
โ€ข The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent โ€” this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have โ€” though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.