15 Deep Philosophy Quotes From “Albert Einstein "

| Thread

1. "Weak people revenge. Strong people forgive. Intelligent People Ignore."

- Albert Einstein
2. "The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil,

but by those who watch them without doing anything."

- Albert Einstein
3. "Don't wait for miracles, your whole life is a miracle."

- Albert Einstein
4. "The measure of intelligence is the ability to change."

- Albert Einstein
5. "Don't listen to the person who has the answers; listen to the person who has the questions."

- Albert Einstein
6. "A ship is always safe at shore but that is not what it's built for."

- Albert Einstein
7. “Life is like riding a bicycle.

To keep your balance, you must keep moving.”

- Albert Einstein
8. “What is right is not always popular and what is popular is not always right.”

- Albert Einstein
9. “If you want to live a happy life,

Tie it to a goal, not to people or things.”

- Albert Einstein
10. "Everybody is a genius.

But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid."

- Albert Einstein
11. "Success comes from curiosity, concentration, perseverance, and self-criticism."

- Albert Einstein
12. “A true genius admits that he/she knows nothing.”

- Albert Einstein
13. "Everything that exists in your life, does so because of two things:

Something you did or something you didn't do."

- Albert Einstein
14. "A person who never made a mistake never tried anything new."

- Albert Einstein
15. “Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them.”

- Albert Einstein
You can't improve if you don't know what you're doing wrong.

• Make time for stillness
• Master over your mind
• Practice decision-making skills

Work on your mental models. Practice critical thinking

get your copy:

https://t.co/Dsp8zPhmjV
Follow 'Philosophy Thoughts' on Instagram for Daily Wise Quotes:

https://t.co/58UQWcE9nq

More from Philosophy Thoughts

More from Principles

You May Also Like

🌿𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 : 𝑫𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒗𝒂 & 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒏𝒖

Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W


Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela


The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.


One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.


Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?