
AR20-21 Notes
Praj Industries
India’s Leader in Bio-Fuel Technology
Put on your helmets & Enjoy the ride 🙂
Retweet for wider reach 🙏

~Ethanol Demand to rise from Govt push for 20% ethanol blending by 2025
~Launched BioPrism tech portfolio for producing bio-based Renewable Materials
~Identified growth areas like Bioplastics, Lignin products, specialty
chemicals, & others

~Praj continues to dominate the bioenergy sector in India
~Engg Business saw good unique opportunities
~Delivered Solutions as part of critical vaccine supply chain

~Reduced water requirement
~Enhanced plant capacity
~Increased ethanol yield
~Reduction in emissions
~Pharma Grade Ethanol
~Production of Compressed Biogas from agri-residues and pressmud

~Gained 5 Indian & 6 Foreign Patents in FY21
~Bagged awards for innovation and waste management

1st Gen Ethanol Domestic:
~Govt push to create opportunity for new 10 bn liters PA capacity
~Good traction for B-heavy molasses and sugar syrup based ethanol plants
1st Gen Ethanol International
~Traction for Pharma grade Ethanol
~Demand up for biofuels

2nd Gen Ethanol
~Has 3 orders for advanced biofuel refineries in India
~Expect demand from North Europe
Compressed BioGas
~Expecting setup of 5000 CBG plants in next 5 years
Others
~Developed process for making Isobutanol
~Scaling up SAF in India

~CPES got orders from a US-based Industrial Gases Company
~Slowdown in domestic Brewery Segment
~Got repeat orders for Zero Liquid Discharge Solutions
~HiPurity to see demand rise from pharma & personal care segments

~Joined with Institute Of Chemical Technology, Mumbai (ICT) for process development and reactor design research
~Produced breakthrough in making “Bio-bitumen” based on Lignin
~Filed for over 300 patents to date

~Ethanol demand to rise for blending
~CBG opportunity to rise
~Bioenergy to become mainstream due to focus on sustainability

More from SmartSyncServices.com
More from Praj
Thanks. Praj Industries perfect smart distribution. More weakness below 336. Rise to 355-365 can face selling pressure.
Below 336 I see 275 in few months as long as its trading below 388 on closing basis CMP 351. https://t.co/iMRpbTfOpU
Below 336 I see 275 in few months as long as its trading below 388 on closing basis CMP 351. https://t.co/iMRpbTfOpU

Your analysis and sl saved my time and some bucks otherwise I would've lost much bigger amount,
— lavish gadia (@gadia_lavish) August 10, 2021
Can you share your views on praj industry @shivaji_1983
Praj Industries - BIG Picture
155-175 Major support and also retest of breakout.
275-220 Probabable targets in medium term.
#PRAJIND https://t.co/dsbj25WPbQ
155-175 Major support and also retest of breakout.
275-220 Probabable targets in medium term.
#PRAJIND https://t.co/dsbj25WPbQ

Thanks. Praj Industries perfect smart distribution. More weakness below 336. Rise to 355-365 can face selling pressure.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 10, 2021
Below 336 I see 275 in few months as long as its trading below 388 on closing basis CMP 351. https://t.co/iMRpbTfOpU pic.twitter.com/mKwgDwreaU
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?