Thread:
When you see something like this we need to investigate a little and join the dots.
https://t.co/GIsIzIct4B

This guy always pops up somewhere along the way, so what is the true agenda here? Who are the players?
https://t.co/HOR94sif64
And now we tie George Soros to Lord Malloch Brown and the Privy council. Soros has just made Malloch Brown head of his Open Society foundation.
https://t.co/6ss7Brnzo4
Malloch Brown one of the heads of Smartmatic.
https://t.co/hvjUICnB3S
And of course let's not forget Domonion.
https://t.co/d3DlCLGoYO
Lots of great info here.
https://t.co/kAuiWLRXtd
Also let's not forget who was behing so called "Spygate" where the Russians were blamed by the corrupt minions and their media puppets.
https://t.co/3ZXw9FesA2
On to the virus issue, let's remember The Pirbright Institue is involved, a crown company, Lord Pirbright was a Rothschild.
https://t.co/HM2X1xLDku
When you research into this, and join all the dots, you can clearly see the people behind what we see happening, and I'm sorry to say it, but it all leads back to the crown and The City of London corporation, they control the CCP.
An essential watch!👍
https://t.co/z8LIboJMta
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from Politics

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?