In the next @NewYorker, I look at a culture of retribution against whistleblowers under Trump—and a new complaint implicating CIA director Gina Haspel and Donald Trump’s nominee for the top legal job in the intelligence community in a retaliation campaign.

In the complaint, a DOJ lawyer claims the retaliation came after he uncovered a secret CIA surveillance program and a practice of lying to prosecutors to conceal its use in criminal cases. The scheme was corroborated in hundreds of pages of emails, transcripts & other documents.
Experts said the concealment may have broken laws and undermined convictions. The FBI told prosecutors that the CIA information, which resulted in numerous prosecutions, came from FBI investigations, named after the Pirates of the Caribbean films, into a fictional crime group.
As the DOJ lawyer, Mark McConnell, raised his concerns to superiors, he faced what six officials said was a retaliation campaign by CIA leadership. Intelligence officials were furious.
CIA officials repeatedly called for repercussions or consequences for McConnell—Haspel allegedly personally joined those calls, though the agency denies it. McConnell’s lawyer, who also represented the Ukraine whistleblower, called for an investigation into Haspel’s role.
Officials also accused Associate Deputy Attorney General Patrick Hovakimian, Trump’s nominee to become the general counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, of failing to protect McConnell.
After he resisted efforts to delete evidence, refused to sign an order by the CIA that officials involved sign NDAs, and talked to government inspector general investigators, McConnell was removed from his role. Officials said he was frozen out of subsequent assignments.
The CIA requested from DOJ legal immunity for its role in the scheme McConnell revealed (DOJ declined). It also explored a deal in which, if McConnell dropped the matter (and his request to talk to me), the agency would withdraw its complaints about him. McConnell passed.
The disclosures come amidst a crackdown on government whistleblowers. The Obama admin charged, under the Espionage Act, more officials with disclosing classified information than all prior administrations combined. In half as long, the Trump admin has matched that count—and more:
McConnell’s allegations have been roiling intelligence and law enforcement circles for months. They are now also drawing congressional scrutiny.

More from Politics

We’ve been getting calls and outreach from Queens residents all day about this.

The community’s response? Outrage.


Amazon is a billion-dollar company. The idea that it will receive hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks at a time when our subway is crumbling and our communities need MORE investment, not less, is extremely concerning to residents here.

When we talk about bringing jobs to the community, we need to dig deep:
- Has the company promised to hire in the existing community?
- What’s the quality of jobs + how many are promised? Are these jobs low-wage or high wage? Are there benefits? Can people collectively bargain?

Displacement is not community development. Investing in luxury condos is not the same thing as investing in people and families.

Shuffling working class people out of a community does not improve their quality of life.

We need to focus on good healthcare, living wages, affordable rent. Corporations that offer none of those things should be met w/ skepticism.

It’s possible to establish economic partnerships w/ real opportunities for working families, instead of a race-to-the-bottom competition.

You May Also Like