Sellers selling OTM get lured by higher premiums and sell near ATM or more than they usually do, this will burn your hand as High premiums also mean that you will end up giving higher premium back than usual as soom as it spikes.
A Thread on How to NOT do blunders while selling Options. 🧵🪡
Sellers selling OTM get lured by higher premiums and sell near ATM or more than they usually do, this will burn your hand as High premiums also mean that you will end up giving higher premium back than usual as soom as it spikes.
Hope drives a man crazy and this is true for trading the most, hoping for a reversal to cut the pain. Humans have a tendency to avoid the pain and one does not accept the pain by not booking a loss
Tom Hougaard explains this well below.
https://t.co/zDbDT2hdej
You cannot make money long term if you don’t have a set of rules or adjustments in place already if you are trading long term. Make a plan or a system so that you always know how to survive. Your Position is non D not the market.
Many people think they are supreme because they are selling options much likely because of the Trend on Twitter in the community,
You are a trader think like one and remain one trading a certain way does not make you better.
I see people come in and Trade Straddles and Strangles just 50-100 points away on expiry to chase profits by the end, I’ve seen this happen because of low capital, please avoid it as Gamma Kills a seller
Option buyers ke kapde bikte hai
Sellers ke Ghar bikte hai
If you are not hedged properly or position size isn’t there you are one event away from going Bank corrupt or worse in Debt. ₹2 takes no time to turn into ₹500 :)
When selling Straddles or strangles Selling will give you a higher Probability of Profit than a good Risk:Reward and you have to adjust R:R with that
Loose one Gain 2 or 3,
doesn’t work here,
Loose 3 gain 1 does work.
More from Optionslearnings
Twitter is like a free workshop.
But 98% of the people miss out on the best tweets.
Here are our threads from March & what they can help you with:🧵
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
1. Benefits of trading in a corporate
2. 12 Technical Analysis
3. Breakdown of Icici Direct Free
4. How to trade debit spreads? Explained by Mr. Ronak
But 98% of the people miss out on the best tweets.
Here are our threads from March & what they can help you with:🧵
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
1. Benefits of trading in a corporate
How to save tax when income is above 50 lakhs?
— Aditya Todmal (@AdityaTodmal) March 1, 2022
Here are 9 benefits of trading in a corporate account: \U0001f9f5
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
2. 12 Technical Analysis
Some people think technical analysis is useless.
— Aditya Todmal (@AdityaTodmal) March 4, 2022
But we use technicals in all our trades.
Here's a list of 12 technical analysis books to help you learn and grow: \U0001f9f5
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
3. Breakdown of Icici Direct Free
A lot of websites provide you with data for trading.
— Aditya Todmal (@AdityaTodmal) March 5, 2022
However, I liked the free website of Icici Direct the most.
Here is a breakdown of what it can do: \U0001f9f5
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
4. How to trade debit spreads? Explained by Mr. Ronak
The best spreads trader on Twitter: @Ronak_Unadkat
— Aditya Todmal (@AdityaTodmal) March 6, 2022
He trades in Nifty & Bank Nifty via spreads majorly.
In the Jainam Broking Speech, he shared how he trades debit and credit spreads:
Here's a breakdown of his 10 step method: \U0001f9f5
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
You May Also Like
I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.
Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel
He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:
He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:
He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
One of the oddest features of the Labour tax row is how raising allowances, which the media allowed the LDs to describe as progressive (in spite of evidence to contrary) through the coalition years, is now seen by everyone as very right wing
— Tom Clark (@prospect_clark) November 2, 2018
Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel
He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:
He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:
He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
The first area to focus on is diversity. This has become a dogma in the tech world, and despite the fact that tech is one of the most meritocratic industries in the world, there are constant efforts to promote diversity at the expense of fairness, merit and competency. Examples:
USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the
ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.
Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this
Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35
USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the
ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.
Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this
Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35