Just an observation on Nifty weekly Options
Observe ATM CE
If PCR > 1
If Option Price is above Vwap but if PCR is not moving up , its likely that price will visit Vwap of Option price before moving up.
Try to buy the CE option around vwap
More from Abhishek
Nifty Futures Positional Trading Using Point & Figure Charts
Following this system on stocks since 2021 and started on Index in 2022
Based on Richard Dennis's Turtle Trading System and the P&F version was created by @Prashantshah267
Details
Chart Settings
Instrument: Nifty Futures ( Current Month)
Chart : Point & Figure
Box Size: 0.10%
Reversal Box: 3
Data Frequency- 1 Min
P&F Charts don't have concept of time but it has a concept Data Frequency, i.e. duration after which to consider plotting X or O on the chart
Since DF is 1 Min here, so we need to wait for 1 Min closing on P&F Charts for Entry, Exit Signals
The chart is an Intraday Chart & requires Intraday data
Which is available on the Real Time Tradepoint Software & on the Web Version of this software
https://t.co/oAshC7rfD1
-
Let's now Discuss Bullish Entry Pattern
The Entry Pattern is called as a Bullish Follow Through Turtle Buy Pattern
This actually comprises of 2 Parts
1. Bullish Turtle Breakout
2. Bullish Turtle Follow Through
For Entry, #1 must happen and there must be a #2 immediately
First Let's Understand the Bullish Turtle Breakout Pattern
This is a 5 X BO Pattern
If current column of X goes above highest ‘X’ in last 5 columns (including current column), then it is a 5-X Turtle breakout.
Following this system on stocks since 2021 and started on Index in 2022
Based on Richard Dennis's Turtle Trading System and the P&F version was created by @Prashantshah267
Details
Chart Settings
Instrument: Nifty Futures ( Current Month)
Chart : Point & Figure
Box Size: 0.10%
Reversal Box: 3
Data Frequency- 1 Min
P&F Charts don't have concept of time but it has a concept Data Frequency, i.e. duration after which to consider plotting X or O on the chart
Since DF is 1 Min here, so we need to wait for 1 Min closing on P&F Charts for Entry, Exit Signals
The chart is an Intraday Chart & requires Intraday data
Which is available on the Real Time Tradepoint Software & on the Web Version of this software
https://t.co/oAshC7rfD1
-
Let's now Discuss Bullish Entry Pattern
The Entry Pattern is called as a Bullish Follow Through Turtle Buy Pattern
This actually comprises of 2 Parts
1. Bullish Turtle Breakout
2. Bullish Turtle Follow Through
For Entry, #1 must happen and there must be a #2 immediately
First Let's Understand the Bullish Turtle Breakout Pattern
This is a 5 X BO Pattern
If current column of X goes above highest ‘X’ in last 5 columns (including current column), then it is a 5-X Turtle breakout.
You May Also Like
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.
The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.
This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.
The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."
This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.
If everyone was holding bitcoin on the old x86 in their parents basement, we would be finding a price bottom. The problem is the risk is all pooled at a few brokerages and a network of rotten exchanges with counter party risk that makes AIG circa 2008 look like a good credit.
— Greg Wester (@gwestr) November 25, 2018
The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.
This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.
The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."
This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.
