Pricing freelancing projects.
Everything I've learned.
A thread.
- Hourly billing
- Daily billing
- Retainers
- Fixed-pricing
- Value-based pricing
Understand their pros and cons.
Understand your circumstances.
Understand the project.
Choose appropriately.
If you need to use it to get started,
Stop using it as soon as you can.
- Estimating every small task?
- Filling out timesheets?
- Sending tons of invoices?
- Having to justify every time you go "over"?
Avoid hourly billing.
1 day = 8 hours
Or
1 day = 1 day
Always use the latter.
The former robs you of your autonomy.
When billing by the day,
Max out at selling 4 days per week to clients.
Give yourself time to grow your own business.
Nothing else.
It's a rolling engagement for a reason.
Day rate can't come with a guarantee of completion.
- The scarcity of your time (availability)
- What you've done before (credibility)
- The project price itself
If you can't write a proposal without research then you need a pre-project.
Discovery work has value and should come at a price.
Client 1: Day rate
Client 2: Fixed priced project
Client 3: Ongoing retainer
Use the strategy that fits the work best.
Freelancer: "I'm happy to do the work for this price".
Client: "I'm happy to pay this price for the work completing".
1. Get a deposit
2. Get a fixed scope
3. To reduce the price you must reduce the scope
4. Don't use estimated days x day rate = price
5. Add a minimum 20% contingency
6. Price high enough to make a profit after you've paid yourself
You are guaranteeing completion.
Going back to the table for more money at this stage leaves a bad taste.
And a prospect who cares can't understand why,
Your positioning is off.
Price tells it's own story, but it needs back up from credibility.
Be aware of this when making offers.
But you should still research your client when using other strategies.
How valuable will you be to them?
Your client's average lead value = £500
You estimate that your work will get them 100 leads in year 1.
That's £50,00 of value.
You give a price for your work based on a % of that figure.
If you can show the value, you can justify the price.
It's billing hourly for less money.
If it's most risky for the client to work with you the price will be lower
Price mirrors risk.
It'll probably happen during the project.
Add 20%.
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x