#CNXIT One of my friend asked me whether to book profit in IT stocks or not ?
Sharing chart for learning purpose👇
Key points :
~ Gave breakout after 20 years{Ratio chart against #Nifty}
~ Near huge resistance .So timepass move expected here{breakout retest/consolidation n all}
More from Pranay Prasun
#jubilantfoodworks #Dominos #Dunkin #popeyes
I was expecting reversal from 3000-3100 level but didn't work and looks like we may see 2600-2700 level
~ Already booked small loss and waiting for right entry
~ Shared weekly chart for reference https://t.co/OFsuLsYN2z
I was expecting reversal from 3000-3100 level but didn't work and looks like we may see 2600-2700 level
~ Already booked small loss and waiting for right entry
~ Shared weekly chart for reference https://t.co/OFsuLsYN2z
#Jubilantfoodworks Upside or Breakdown ? Good RR at CMP https://t.co/HXaHFX5fLt pic.twitter.com/RX5nREYuGU
— Pranay Prasun (@PranayPrasun) February 13, 2022
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
