10 Netflix Movies Recommendation To Watch With Your Loved Ones This Christmas:

1.

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Subscribe to my New FREE newsletter.

Why should you join?

• Motivational Content to Keep you Fired Up.

• Self improvement Content to Make you better in every aspect.

Click below:
https://t.co/TVVsj8nF6l
Consider joining my Free telegram channel to add motivation in your life:
https://t.co/UfUzj3LiuS
That's a wrap!

If you found this thread added 1% value in your life, kindly RT the first tweet & follow me @PsycheWizard

This page exists to:

• Inspire you.
• Challenge you to think differently.
• Make you a better version of yourself.

Thank you for reading!

More from Movies

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?