#Anytime God is involved..the outcome is predictable. Part 1

Of a truth, everytime the Almighty God steps in, the outcome is predictable.

Here I am studying once again, the book of Exodus 14....

it must have been a time of fear & trepidation for the israelites...

they were indeed stuck between the red sea & Pharaoh's merciless army who obviously had the advantage, however, Pharaoh could only see as "far" as his eyes could see.

He thought to himself, "I have closed them in...
Exodus 14:3 MSG
"Pharaoh will think, 'The Israelites are lost;
they're confused. The wilderness has closed in on them.'

And here was God laughing in heaven, seeing how a mere man was acting like the alpha & omega.

The pressure was now on Moses to do something...only God knows what was going through Moses' mind at that time, & while he was
waiting on God, he heard God speaking again, "don't wait on Me anymore, Move.. the deed is done."

Exodus 14:13
Moses spoke to the people: "Don't be afraid. Stand firm and watch God do his work of salvation for you today. Take a good look at the Egyptians today for you're never
going to see them again.

What reassuring words

Exodus 14:15 God said to Moses: "Why cry out to me? Speak to the Israelites. Order them to get moving.
Exodus 14:17 "Meanwhile I'll make sure the Egyptians keep up their stubborn chase -I'll use Pharaoh & his entire army,
his chariots & horsemen.

It was a setup & pharaoh knew it not.
God sure has many ways to display His glory. Exodus 14:18 to put my Glory on display so that d Egyptians will realize that I am God."

Did you also notice that God drew a line between d Israelites & Pharaoh's army?
It was a line neither could cross. The hunter could not cross over and neither could the hunted.

Exodus 14:20 The Cloud was now between the camp of Egypt and the camp of Israel. The Cloud enshrouded one camp in darkness and flooded the other with light. The two camps didn't
come near each other all night.

It wasn't just a line.. While one was enjoying light, the other was experiencing darkness.

Did you also observe that, during the crossing of the red sea, both the pursuer & the pursued walked on different grounds?

While, the seabed became dry
ground to the Israelites, it became very muddy for the Egyptians.

Exo 14:22 The Israelites walked through the sea on dry ground with the waters a wall to the right & to the left.
Exo 14:25 He clogged d wheels of their chariots; they were stuck in the mud.
The Egyptians realized this a little two late.
They said, "Run from Israel! God is fighting on their side & against Egypt!"

That was just d beginning of their woes & miscalculation. God wasn't done with them yet.

There are grave consequences when u touch d apple of God's eyes
Exodus 14:24 It was now the morning watch. God looked down from the Pillar of Fire & Cloud on the Egyptian army & threw them into a panic.

Now, I'm trying to imagine what it looked like when God caused panic amongst them. Terrible I guess.

Exodus 14:28 The waters returned,
drowning the chariots and riders of Pharaoh's army that had chased after Israel into the sea. Not one of them survived. They all perished in the Red sea.

Glory to God for always making a way of escape for His chosen.

Isaiah 43:2b MSG
When you're in over your head, I'll be there

More from Pastor 't.O.s.I.n. Olunuga

More from Message

You May Also Like

@EricTopol @NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad B.1.1.7 reveals clearly that SARS-CoV-2 is reverting to its original pre-outbreak condition, i.e. adapted to transgenic hACE2 mice (either Baric's BALB/c ones or others used at WIV labs during chimeric bat coronavirus experiments aimed at developing a pan betacoronavirus vaccine)

@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad 1. From Day 1, SARS-COV-2 was very well adapted to humans .....and transgenic hACE2 Mice


@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad 2. High Probability of serial passaging in Transgenic Mice expressing hACE2 in genesis of SARS-COV-2


@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad B.1.1.7 has an unusually large number of genetic changes, ... found to date in mouse-adapted SARS-CoV2 and is also seen in ferret infections.
https://t.co/9Z4oJmkcKj


@NBA @StephenKissler @yhgrad We adapted a clinical isolate of SARS-CoV-2 by serial passaging in the ... Thus, this mouse-adapted strain and associated challenge model should be ... (B) SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA loads in mouse lung homogenates at P0 to P6.
https://t.co/I90OOCJg7o
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x