BC MARLAGOFBIDOJ
Saved by @TXstillWatching

Documents at Mar-a-Lago Marked ‘Classified‘ Were Already Declassified https://t.co/70QRXjkICS via @BreitbartNews

 Wednesday that a report claiming classified materials were found at Mar-a-Lago is misleading and that the documents were actually already declassified by then-President Donald Trump, but the classification markings had not been updated.
“Trump declassified whole sets of materials in anticipation of leaving government that he thought the American public should have the right to read themselves,” Patel
“The White House counsel failed to generate the paperwork to change the classification markings, but that doesn’t mean the information wasn’t declassified,” Patel
Former Fed prosecutor Kash Patel says that 40% of the declassified documents are being withheld from the public
https://t.co/W5qfKBKFcc
NBC News reported in February that the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) found items “marked as classified national security information” within boxes sent to Mar-a-Lago. NARA made the disclosure in a letter replying to questions from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY)
Report Alleges FBI "Had Personal Stake" in Mar-a-Lago Raid - AGENTS WERE AFTER SPYGATE Documents Trump Was Holding That Likely Implicated FBI...

https://t.co/wb1ryi74U5
As reported earlier today — President Trump declassified a binder on January 19th, 2021 that contains hundreds of pages about the Crossfire Hurricane scandal. It contains damaging information about the corrupt actors involved with our government.
Two different DOJ Attorney General’s have defied President Trump’s direct lawful order to publish the binder in the Federal Register. It’s been 19 months as the DOJ defies the order, and every FOIA request to make it public.
"Newsweek has been told by DOJ officials that the Mar-a-Lago raid was "an FBI operation" and the DOJ was "not involved..."

IF true, it seems the FBI raid was undertaken to find documents that implicated the FBI in criminal acts during the Mueller investigation.
Saw this and had a thought... nuclear secrets? Like Uranium One Scandal?
Russia/Uranium Scandal: Declassify the 37-Pages of Evidence Showing $145 Million Bribery Scandal Involving The Clinton Foundation

The FBI has refused to make important documents public.

https://t.co/fhnUJrEJnT
FACT 1: Evidence of Wrongdoing Exits
FACT 2: The Secret Information Contain Important Finding of National Interest
“There is definitely material that would be illuminating to the issues that have been raised. Somebody should fight to make it public.”

That somebody could be Trump, who could add those 37pgs of documents to his declassification order he is considering in the Russia case.
FACT 3: Either the CFIUS Process Was Corrupted or Broken, or the FBI Dropped the Ball; or Both
This Summary of the Case Raises Important Questions:
Questions
More...
Obama, Clinton Approved Russia Hoax — Newly Declassified Documents
https://t.co/7DqQ9Vjix9
...remember this?
Obama Admin’s Treasury Dept. knowingly funded Al-Qaeda according to newly declassified documents by President Trump and Charles Grassley of Senate Finance Committee.

https://t.co/0bqUg5VMbR
Pdf📄https://t.co/9bhZS4g6Od
Trump ordered the declassification and release of a binder filled with sensitive FBI documents on Jan. 19, 2021, but the Justice Department never complied.
Judicial Watch said in its lawsuit that it filed a FOIA request for the declassified documents in February, but the DOJ never complied.

https://t.co/dDrLM6y7Av
You can read the full lawsuit here:

File
https://t.co/QmbqdERIXf
The many of the docs that Trump declassified never saw the light of day, even though they were lawfully declassified by Trump and the DOJ was instructed by the president through Meadows to expeditiously release them after redacting private information as necessary.

See memo
Meadows memo was obtained from the National Archives. The National Archives denied having a copy of the declassified binder. Former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows gave back to the DOJ.

https://t.co/JGSZy27tPL
So who has the binder? Meadows supposedly returned it with memo to DOJ with instructions January 20th. The national archives has memo that accompanied binder but denies having the binder.
Does the DOJ have binder? Are they worried Trump kept a copy? What files that were declassified are being hidden from We the People?

You May Also Like

Jig's Patel
Jig's Patel
@jigspatel1988
How to trade on Expiry day with Nifty straddle?
(System trading on Expiry)

Triple straddle is one of the best and accurate methods for expiry day

If nifty trading at 15720 then will sell three straddles above 50 points from ATM, below 50 points and ATM.

Ex.
Sell straddle 15700(ATM), 15650(ATM-50), 15750 (ATM+50)

Stoploss of 80% on every leg and run your trade till 3 PM

Once SL hit in any Leg just keep holding other leg till expiry with SL (Never or less chance to hit both SL on expiry day)

Trading timing at 9:20 the Morning
ALL , STRADDLE BACKTEST , STRADDLE
Learning @ Prakash
Learning @ Prakash
@Prakashplutus
My simple Approach towards Breakout trading :

1. Scan stocks on the basis of FTDB Scanner.

2. Buy stocks with EMA-9> EMA-21> EMA-63 > EMA 200 & Volume 200% up

3. maximum SL of 1.25X ( ATR )

4. I do breakout trading only in Nifty -500 stocks

#StockMarket
#trading
#Nifty
SCREENERS
Advertisement
Emma Hilton
Emma Hilton
@FondOfBeetles
This is Kuinini ‘Nini’ Manumua, the woman who was ultimately displaced by inclusion of Laurel Hubbard.

She’s 21, and it would have been her first Olympics.
ALL
Noah Smith
Noah Smith
@Noahpinion
Krugman is, of course, right about this. BUT, note that universities can do a lot to revitalize declining and rural regions.


See this thing that @lymanstoneky wrote:

And see this thing that I wrote:

And see this book that @JamesFallows wrote:

And see this other thing that I wrote:
SOCIETY
David Rothkopf
David Rothkopf
@djrothkopf
Pretending that voting for Trump or denying climate change or suggesting the solution to every problem is more guns is a legitimate point of view, worthy of respect is not "how America works." It is how it dies.

People in a free society are entitled to any point of view no matter how obviously wrong or outlandish or destructive provided they do not impose their views on others.

But suggesting that something ignorant or divorced from reality warrants the same kind of treatment in public debate as something based in fact or at least credible is absurd and when done on behalf of a society in public media or academic settings it is self-destructive.

We would not grant media coverage or much bandwidth at all to a group that argued that unicorns exist or that there was a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Yet views like denying climate change or basing policy decisions on sweeping, obvious lies, are just as unsound.

Somewhere, somehow, judgments must be made. Some behaviors are wrong and must be condemned. Someone must challenge lies and demand facts. Coddling people who embrace idiocies does not help them no matter how loudly they demand to be coddled.
POLITICS