in order to answer this one needs to understand a thing well enough to know what success looks like and to know what failure modes exist.
The reason to try a new approach to things is because you have demonstrated proof that existing approaches are not working.
let's unpack:
1. what counts as proof?
2. what counts as failure?
3. not working for whom?
4. not working towards what end?
in order to answer this one needs to understand a thing well enough to know what success looks like and to know what failure modes exist.
the most relevant group, obviously, are people currently involved in working in/on/with/through (prepositions lol) the thing.
also relevant however are people who might become directly involved in the future. the over-the-horizon growth potential.
this is part of the necessary context. systems are a means to an end. if the system either cannot clearly define its ends, or defines unobtainable ends, it is incoherent.
More from Life
You May Also Like
H was always unseen in S2NL :)
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Sir, Log yahan.. 13 days patience nhi rakh sakte aur aap 2013 ki baat kar rahe ho. Even Aap Ready made portfolio banakar bhi de do to bhi wo 1 month me hi EXIT kar denge \U0001f602
— BhavinKhengarSuratGujarat (@IntradayWithBRK) September 19, 2021
Neuland 2700 se 1500 & Sequent 330 to 230 kya huwa.. 99% retailers/investors twitter par charcha n EXIT\U0001f602