BC LEGAL
Saved by @CodyyyGardner

LIVE: Julian Assange’s bail hearing to begin shortly at Westminster Magistrates Court in London.

Live updates below:

 Connected via remote video with other journos and currently waiting.
Judge Vanessa Baraitser ruled against extradition on Monday, citing Julian's health and brutal prison conditions in the US under Special Administrative Measures (SAMs). His defence team opted to make the bail application today instead of rushing it.

https://t.co/jnQgWnDKyU
Today will hopefully see him released from HMP Belmarsh. This is a category A, maximum security men's prison on London's outskirts, usually reserved for the most violent of criminals. The fact he was sent there speaks to the political nature of the trial.

https://t.co/I3eNHPyzBv
Assange was arrested in April 2019 when London Met entered the Ecuadorian embassy. Within minutes he was sent to Belmarsh prison to serve 50 weeks for supposedly breaching bail – however this doesn't hold up, as he had been granted political asylum by Ecuador.
How can a journalist be sent to a maximum security prison for allegedly "jumping bail"? This is outrageous. Sweden dropped all charges against Assange. However, the UK kept him at Belmarsh, even after serving his sentence, at the US' behest, pending an indictment against him.
Julian is being denied his winter clothes, has to plug the draft in his cell with books, is denied visitors.... among many other affronts on his physical and psychological wellbeing.

https://t.co/Dgl2WrGhs0
The conditions in Belmarsh are unacceptable and detrimental to Julian's physical & mental health, as was confirmed by numerous doctors during the hearing. This is why it is imperative he be granted bail today, pending the US appeal to Monday's decision.

https://t.co/CINhtGIc4G
UN Special Rapporteur on Torture @NilsMelzer visited Assange in 2019 in Belmarsh and rebuked his persecution. He said yesterday:"Even with a pending appeal, his continued isolation in a high security prison is completely unnecessary and disproportionate."

https://t.co/tRiY0mtCBc
We can see and hear the court now. The dock is empty. Camera is being adjusted, lots of bustling and preparation going on.
To further highlight the scandalous nature of this entire affair: not only is Julian being held at Belmarsh– the UK's equivalent of Guantanamo Bay– but even Al Qaeda figures, previously held at the same place were allowed out and treated better than him:

https://t.co/XcbRflkDCV
Assange enters the dock. He is asked to stand, give his full name and DOB.
Prosecution says: Assange has shown himself as someone who has gone to extraordinary lengths to avoid.. .And now we can't hear anything because the UK's infamous modern court infrastructure of 2021 refused to function properly. :))))
Audio is back
Prosecution: Court cannot grant bail to someone who "... cannot be trusted to surrender".
Pros refers to the judgement; talking about Snowden being in Hong Kong, US issued an arrest warrant on charges of theft of information from US govt, etc. Alleges that Assange and WikiLeaks encouraged leakers to steal info and openly tried to help Snowden evade arrest.
Prosecution talks about plans to get Snowden out of Moscow airport to Latin America.

"That should leave this court in no doubt as to Assange's resources and abilities .. to arrange flight to another country".
She continues.. other states will offer Assange protection. She refers to the fact that the president of Mexico offered Assange asylum after Monday's judgement.
Prosecution says Assange doesn't need to even arrange anything, he need simply walk into another embassy.
Prosecution: "He is capable of going to almost any length to avoid that possibility [extradition to the US]."

(Yeah, gee, I wonder why).
Prosecution refers to previous court ruling allowing Assange bail in 2010, and arguments that were made in Assange's favour.
She does this in order to assert that even the good faith ruling in Assange's favour (that were he to abscond bail, this would diminish his character among even his supporters), did not materialise.
Dobbins (for the prosecution): "Mr Assange regards himself above the law, and no cost is too great, in terms of him avoiding being sent to the United States".
She cites the Swedish prosecution and cost to taxpayer of him seeking political asylum in Ecuadorian embassy.
Prosecution refers to the fact he was also given a diplomatic passport. (I talked about this with former Ecuadorian Consul, Fidel Narvaez, the UK refused to register him as a diplomat so that's not really an argument).
We can argue the violations against the Vienna Convention, but the UK was definitely going to arrest Assange if he stepped outside, even with a diplomatic passport – that's the point.
Dobbins is trying to downplay the COVID outbreak in Belmarsh – and astonishingly makes the argument that Assange would not be able to commit suicide in a US jail (??).
"Mr. Assange's mental health was not as severe as claimed by the experts, and that was a view that was confirmed by the prosecution's experts". (Not really true, but okay). See here: https://t.co/IvC8qqDxXU
Dobbin concludes by saying the factors preventing bail are insurmountable.

Fitzgerald rises for the defence.
Defence makes the case that the judge's ruling changes everything and gives Assange no reason to abscond bail, because she ruled in his favour.
"The ground for extradition has gone, that would be a reason for them to at least attain conditional liberty"
Defence refers to latest statement from outgoing prosecutor from Eastern District of Virginia Zachary Terwilliger, that "He's uncertain as to whether Biden would continue the extradition".

Terwilliger: "Assange case has already consumed years of work"

https://t.co/0sr5mAGZuK
Defence says that for the first time in all these years, Assange is entitled to discharge, and the burden is now on prosecution to prove otherwise.
Defence: Court ruling massively removes any reason to abscond

"We say Assange now has every reason to stay in this jurisdiction where he has. the protection of the rule of law and this court's decision and to abide by every bail condition, however stringent."
Fitzgerald: judgement recognises the importance of human interaction re his mental health.
Defence: Allowing Assange out would not only alleviate mental stress, but anchor him to his family and his community. A totally changed position from 2012.
Defence refers now to major COVID outbreak in HMP Belmarsh. "I understand that in his wing, some 50% of people have COVID."
Judge wants clarification on the figures, they are trying to get the latest.

Defence: Over 90 people have tested positive in house block one. (This info comes from Assange). HMP Belmarsh confirmed 60 cases officially before Christmas.

Judge says this runs contrary to her info
Prosecution says they got an email Belmarsh last night.

These are the official figures of COVID positive cases according to Belmarsh from Dec 24.

Directly employed: 80+

Prisoners: 3

Judge says she will accept this info, as it is the latest available.
Defence: COVID cases is not our main argument.

Fitzgerald returns to Baraitser's ruling and highlights the risk to Assange's mental health that detention poses. He reasserts that Assange has no reason to abscond. This will be the 1st opportunity for him to live with his family.
Defence: If Assange has his family and his wishes to live a sheltered life with his family. If you have any residual concerns, they can be met with stringent bail conditions. He'd be under house arrest. Resident with his partner and 2 children [address provided to court].
"The absconsion was 8 years ago in a totally different situation, totally different request and ruling. Everything has changed, both in the nature of the request, ruling of the court, and now the importance that he can be ruined with his family, essential to his mental health."
Defence asks judge to consider that Assange will be placed under real time surveillance, wearing a GPS tag to monitor his location, among other assurances.
"Assange has already served his full sentence for absconding back in 2012. Court has found that he suffers from depression and ASD. Court has also found that condition is alleviated by contact & support from family."
Defence: Court must consider this and determine whether proportionate to deny him his liberty. This will be the first time he is able to live with his family and enjoy the company of his partner and family. Also risk of COVID would be significantly reduced.
Defence: all these factors taken together, provide an overwhelming argument in favour of bail.
Regarding the question of Mexico: Defence says "the offer was quite clearly to come into affect AFTER the legal proceedings were concluded, not a suggestion to welcome him into the embassy".
Judge says "that doesn't make an awful lot of sense to me. If the proceedings are concluded in your client's favour, they will offer him asylum. If they are not, they will [still] offer him asylum?"
Fitzgerald refers to Gary McKinnon @DoubleOhNever and Lauri Love, that they remain safe in UK jurisdiction. If they set foot in another place the US can get them.
Court is adjourned for 10 mins.
To further explain this point: even if the UK upholds the decision NOT to extradite Assange, this doesn't mean Assange is safe in other jurisdictions with which the US might have an extradition treaty and be able to grab him. Hence Mexico's offer.

https://t.co/Ne8nMwj2pF
Court resumes.

Fitzgerald for the defence: it's clear that going to the Ecuadorian embassy, was extremely unpleasant. That is not something he is ever likely to repeat.
Defence: the offer from Mexico has been significantly misquoted. This is going through the proper channels to see if he can be freed and granted asylum. Not he can come into our embassy and we will welcome him.
Defence makes the case that Assange is best protected in the UK's jurisdiction (thus no reason to abscond), where he has the protection of the rule of law – esp since she ruled in his favour. Even if she hadn't, he would have the protections of High Court, Supreme Court, etc.
Defence highlights eroding situation of no social visits since last year (due to COVID) and this is likely to continue given govt lockdown. If Assange remains there, he will remain in lockdown, no social visits, and he will remain at risk of COVID.
"Even people suspected of terrorism are given bail / house arrest" – (precisely what I've highlighted before!)
Defence is now seated.

Judge Baraitser speaks about the history of Assange's case.
#BREAKING: Julian Assange’s bail request is denied.
This is a huge thread and twitter is lagging. I've typed out her reasoning. Give me a second to put it here.
Judge Baraitser gave the following reasons in denying Julian Assange bail: She started out by going through the timeline of events from 2010 and onwards, about him being given bail and then seeking asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy.
Judge Baraitser: “On Monday I ruled in Assange's favor. As a matter of fairness, the US must be allowed to challenge my decision”.
"Assange has already demonstrated that he is willing to flout the order of this court. The stringent conditions imposted on him did nothing to oppose this."
"Those who put large amounts of money to guarantee his return to court ended up losing all their money..."
"The conditions in this prison bare no comparison to his conditions if extradited to the US. Assange has a huge support network available to him, should he wish to go underground."
She refers to him aiding Snowden. She accepts the latest COVID figures in Belmarsh provided by the prosecution (3 prisoners tested positive). She deems Belmarsh to be managing COVID properly.
In light of all this Judge Baraitser denies Julian Assange's request for bail. He is taken out of the dock and will be sent back to Belmarsh, pending appeal by the US regarding Monday's decision.
I will be going live shortly to give a full summary of what happened: https://t.co/wJOEJqGydt

Thank you for supporting independent journalism:

https://t.co/ANLXP7sJ0v
https://t.co/52czYRvdqw
Full video report: https://t.co/SI9mYoaLcm

More from Legal

Antifascist Trash Panda \u2199\ufe0f\u2199\ufe0f\u2199\ufe0f\U0001f99d
Antifascist Trash Pand...
@trashpandaAFA
1/ On Jan 2 we introduced Proud Boy Billy Knutson to the world. Billy said he was going to DC to "literally go Antifa hunting."

Well, Proud Boy Billy Knutson stormed the U.S. capitol with his fellow terrorists and participated in a failed coup:
https://t.co/Ctb7vThYhs


2/ Terrorist Proud Boy Billy Knutson placing himself at the scene of the failed coup in DC to overthrow democracy:


3/ From terrorist Proud Boy Billy Knutson's Parler in his own words:

PS: We see Texas Charter Plane 5 Jenna Ryan made the big time at the failed U.S. coup in DC


4/ FAIR USE claim: shows context in tweets

Terrorist Proud Boy Billy Knutson's Parler video where you can hear him screaming, "Stand Back and Stand By Motherf*ckers!" while standing on the US capitol steps. Speaker says they'll be back on Inauguration Day.


5/ Terrorist Proud Boy Billy Knutson already lost his Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, & Twitter before heading to DC

However @Spotify & @YouTube continue to platform Billy Knutson, aka Playboy The Beast, a terrorist that participated in the U.S. failed
LEGAL
Hunter
Hunter
@KAG4US
Ok so I have figured it out. This is the team that retrieved the laptops (and whatever else). Notice the two women who are unlocking the door. Three men on the right suiting up. And the man in black with zip tie cuffs that are ready to use, in case they need to keep someone down.
LEGAL
Advertisement
Pug_Apu: Space Force Guardian
Pug_Apu: Space Force G...
@Pug_Apu
Hey all you ‘nothing is habbening’ guys 👋.

Check this out

This was last night in Sterling Virginia
LEGAL
\U0001f438\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8
🐸🇺🇸...
@censoredpepe
Important information I’ve gathered since getting into 17. Feel free to copy & paste this information to your notes before I’m banned :)

Hillary’s crime against children (pg 294): https://t.co/Otrs9yTQNy

B_M & aunteefa riot index- 6,111 riot videos:
LEGAL
Zoe Tillman
Zoe Tillman
@ZoeTillman
A detention hearing is about to start in federal court in Arkansas in the case of Richard Barnett, the man photographed sitting in Nancy Pelosi's office (see: https://t.co/GAAENhkxf0). He's been in custody since his arrest

Prosecutors alleged Barnett was carrying a stun gun. He's charged with entering a restricted area w/ a weapon, violent entry/disorderly conduct, and theft. There isn't anything on the docket indicating what the govt/Barnett will be seeking as far as detention v. release


We're still waiting for the Richard Barnett detention hearing to start in Arkansas. Meanwhile, follow @o_ema for updates on initial appearances in DC federal court today for a few of the Capitol insurrection arrestees -->


Richard Barnett's detention hearing is underway in Arkansas — Judge Erin Wiedemann will decide if Barnett should stay behind bars. The first witness is FBI special agent Jonathan Willett, who was involved in the Capitol riot investigation

FBI agent walks the judge through surveillance videos that the agent says show Barnett walking in and out of Nancy Pelosi's office, with a "walking stick Taser" on his hip, as well as the widely disseminated photos of Barnett sitting in Pelosi's chair with his feet up
LEGAL

You May Also Like

Jonathan Ware
Jonathan Ware
@ReassessHistory
Rhino Barges

One of the dullest, coolest, more bizarre and fascinating pieces of kit used in Normandy.

Which NO ONE REALLY CARES ABOUT.

BUT I DO AND YOU SHOULD TOO.
/1

#WW2 #SWW #History


Planning for Overlord and Neptune had a serious snag, how to get troops from LSTs onto the beach as simply ramming them onto the beaches and dropping the ramp was known to damage the exceptionally vulnerable LSTs and felt to be unsustainable in the mid to long term. /2


LSTs were essential in sustaining Overlord's progress and were a subject of major headaches in the planning phase, and a real subject of friction when it came to launching additional amphibious operations such as Dragoon.

A single LSTs loss represented a capability nick. /3


So, logic dictated, we don't really want these remarkable but rare and highly valuable vessels constantly doing beach landings, we want something to act as a medium between ship to shore, and in came the (mostly) American designed Rhino. /4


I fucking love Rhinos.

Seriously.

Graceful lines of pure industrial pedigree.

Modular.

LOOK AT IT. /5
HISTORY
Jaya_Upadhyaya
Jaya_Upadhyaya
@Jayalko1
HORANADU ANNAPOORNESHWARI, CHIKMAGALUR (KAR)
#bharatmandir

Annapoorneshwari is the Devi of nutrition and food. The literal meaning of Annapoorneshwari is “Feeding one and all”. Anyone who comes here is offered meals and shelter within the premises.
@LostTemple7


Maharshi Agastya is believed to have done pratishtha here.

Once, Shiva and Parvati had an argument. Shiva declared everything in the world including food to be Maya or illusion. To prove him wrong, Devi Parvati disappeared resulting in entire Earth becoming still.


Taking pity, Devi appeared as Annapoorna and relieved everyone.
Another belief is that once Shiva beheaded Brahma and his skull got stuck in Shiva’s hand. He was cursed that till the skull is not full of food or grains, it will remain stuck to his hands.


Shiva went everywhere and asked for food but the skull was never full. He finally came here and Maa Annapoorna filled the skull with grains and reversed Shiva’s curse.

It is believed that who ever visits Devi Annapoorna here will never be without food in their lives.
ALL
Advertisement
Jaya_Upadhyaya
Jaya_Upadhyaya
@Jayalko1
SRI MOOKAMBIKA DEVI, KOLLUR (KAR)

There was an Asura, Kaumasura, who was doing penance to please Shiva and get a boon. To prevent him from asking for a boon, Devi Saraswati made him dumb (hence called Mookasur)
Later, Adi Parashakti slayed him and came to be called Mookambika.


It is said that Adi Shankaracharya had a vision in which Devi agreed to follow him provided he did not look back. He kept walking and was assured of her presence due to the sound of anklets. When he reached here in Kollur, he turned back as the sound of anklets had stopped.


So Devi stayed here and merged with the lingam. The place came to be called Mookambika Kshetram.
The linga has integrated on it’s left side MahaKali, Maha Lakshmi and Maha Saraswathi and on the right side- Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva.


A swarna rekha (gold line) divides this linga into left and right portion. Adi Shakthi in this Udhbhavlinga form appears only here.
Devi sits in padmasana and has 4 hands.
Adi Shankaracharya installed the Sri Chakra in front of Devi and also composed the Soundarya Lahiri here.
ALL
Billy Bostickson \U0001f3f4\U0001f441&\U0001f441 \U0001f193
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 ...
@BillyBostickson
1. Project 1742 (EcoHealth/DTRA)
Risks of bat-borne zoonotic diseases in Western Asia

Duration: 24/10/2018-23 /10/2019

Funding: $71,500
@dgaytandzhieva
https://t.co/680CdD8uug


2. Bat Virus Database
Access to the database is limited only to those scientists participating in our ‘Bats and Coronaviruses’ project
Our intention is to eventually open up this database to the larger scientific community
https://t.co/mPn7b9HM48


3. EcoHealth Alliance & DTRA Asking for Trouble
One Health research project focused on characterizing bat diversity, bat coronavirus diversity and the risk of bat-borne zoonotic disease emergence in the region.
https://t.co/u6aUeWBGEN


4. Phelps, Olival, Epstein, Karesh - EcoHealth/DTRA


5, Methods and Expected Outcomes
(Unexpected Outcome = New Coronavirus Pandemic)
ALL
Pulp Librarian
Pulp Librarian
@PulpLibrarian
Due to the pandemic you may not have visited your local library in a while. So come with me on a virtual library tour, courtesy of stock photography, to see what we do for a living...


Libraries are of course information resource centres, but in many ways they are so much more. To get the best out of them you need to really know your way around the stacks.


The enquiries desk is normally your first stop in a library, and this is where you will meet The Angry Librarian! Why is she angry? Because you keep asking her stupid questions!


"Are you open?"
"Do you have a toilet?"
"That chair's wobbly!"
"Why isn't it available in audiobook?"
"Someone else is on the computer and that's not fair!"

On and on it goes...


And that's why in the library we insist on silence. It's the only way to stop us swearing at all the idiotic things you ask us. And we've looked up a lot of old swear words: beardsplitter, bescumber, rantallion, smellfungus etc. We're such muckspouts...
ALL