JBCHEPHARM at 20x FY23 EPS is a much safer and a better buy than a conventional FMCG Player like HINDUNILVR with no significant reinvestment moat and single digit earnings growth.
The difference here is that JB can still reinvest bulk of its cash flows at a similar/higher ROIIC.
The cash compounding machine JBCHEPHARM does 42% ROCE ex cash, EBITDA Margins at 27.4%, I as an investor would be happy if they maintain margins in mid 20s.
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) June 15, 2021
FY21 EPS of Rs. 58, you are getting a company growing at > 20% since the last 5 years at < 1 PEG and 26x TTM Earnings. pic.twitter.com/5u4u0C5MpK
More from Saket Reddy
Haters are still hating it, time to pyramid once again!
Double Top Buy, T20 Pattern - Bullish & Super Pattern - Bullish above 625.07 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/EDqa7dAAKn

LAURUSLABS
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) May 3, 2021
Haters are gonna hate, but IMO, this is the best opportunity to start pyramiding and make it a well sized holding.
A trio of patterns coming together, has one of the highest success rate!
Double Top Buy, T20 Pattern - Bullish & Super pattern - Bullish above 477.81! https://t.co/SqzkTyb9wx pic.twitter.com/hTj7mfAOqy
You May Also Like
One of the oddest features of the Labour tax row is how raising allowances, which the media allowed the LDs to describe as progressive (in spite of evidence to contrary) through the coalition years, is now seen by everyone as very right wing
— Tom Clark (@prospect_clark) November 2, 2018
Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel
He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:
He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:
He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw