Indian Muslims are not acknowledging the bitter truth. Open your eyes. This is not the same India that we knew. If anyone is still selling old history & redundant Tehzeeb he’s misleading you & doing disservice. It’s better to get real & look ahead. Rules of the game have changed

When they tell you India is still the same or you don’t need to do anything different they’re misleading you❌
You don’t fight with swords today because 200 years ago your ancestors won fighting with swords. It’s a changed world & a changed India. If you want to survive, “Adapt”
When I say harsh things about political immaturity by North Indian Muslims, it’s not because I’m connected to any party. I see that we’ve failed in last 73 years & we were sleeping with enemies. Cant trust any Yadav, Harijan or Brahman leadership. Muslims got to fight own battles
In the present scenario Indian Muslims will have to look at future than history. Think ahead what worse laws & restrictions that may come up in coming years. You’re always caught unprepared because you don’t want to look at bad things & keep thinking of the rosy picture. Wrong ❌
Three years ago I wrote this long thread on North Indian Muslims. At that time most Muslims from trolled me & disagreed with me but the reality hit them hard when UP & MP started going Hindutva way. Then came anti CAA protest in 2020 UP Muslims were shot dead. I was warning them https://t.co/rl341Bk9aM
And in 2021 when I’m writing such threads on other sects making a mistake by appeasing the killers & throwing Muslim majority under the bus. Some outdated & sellout Muslims are accusing me of being sectarian. I’m actually warning them in their own interest. They won’t be spared https://t.co/OaPWcqtJRn
I wrote this thread on the mistakes made by Indian Muslims post 1947. Each word was painful but I had to spell it out. If we still don’t change then we have to remember #Allamaiqbal words

Na samjhoge to mit jaoge
ai hindostan walo
Tumhaari dastan tak bhi na hogi
dastanon mein https://t.co/T2Td01f4sa

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?