#Watchlist
Upside Candidates
• #HAL 1620
• #SBILIFE 1160
• #MINDACORP 227
• #MANGCHEFER 109
@kuttrapali26 @caniravkaria @KommawarSwapnil @chartworldat
@jbotlagunta @nakulvibhor @FlamingoTrader_ @Jitendra_stock @MarketViewByPB @chartmojo
#stocktowatch
#stockmarkets
More from Hal
HAL:
T1 done. Smooth sailing https://t.co/txbiEouQrg
T1 done. Smooth sailing https://t.co/txbiEouQrg
HAL:
— Vipul Kankaria (@cobbervipul) March 31, 2022
Looking good on charts. Defence push will continue to grow.
Looks undervalued as compared to peers.
Major wave 3 ongoing. Closing above 1570 will give further momentum
CMP: 1485
SL: 1348
TGTS: 1647 / 1790
Add in Parts and Dips pic.twitter.com/ygxXlx55B9
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".