https://t.co/it23ZtCXTo

https://t.co/VZAtJBvIwj
They have pangolin Cells in a dish! These cells (primary fibroblasts) are collected at 2020-03-20 and are susceptible to contamination by lab viruses and environmental viruses. (Although no Coronaviruses have been found in either

datasets). These cells will no doubt be used for the fabrication of credible-looking samples for all manner of fraud viruses—using infectious clone rescue within the cells. They were originally provided by the Beijing University. Lentivirus presence in both sample suggest
Sample cell culture already contaminated by environmental viruses. Late collection date also make the dataset useless for Coronavirus-related studies.
Date of collection: 03/20/2020 and 04/08/2020.
The DNA zoo project brag about coronaviruses—and therefore there is a very high likelihood that infectious clone rescue may have been conducted with these cells. Catarrhini is also found in the datasets. Cells may be manipulated, and infectious clone may be inserted.
https://t.co/Xsw4KDSTaH

https://t.co/xmmzC5Lo3v
Although no Coronaviruses have been found in these samples.
Due to the existence of both Manis Pentadactyla and Manis Javanica cell cultures within the Beijing University labs, NO further datasets claiming “pangolin coronavirus” can be trusted in any way. They now have the ability to rescue infectious clones and make “pure” samples.
https://t.co/bCxtU7AGsg

https://t.co/XpC7s9j55k
The very original cell samples were provided by the Beijing university.
Due to their late date of collection, contamination of lab plate by circulating SARS-CoV-2 is also a real possibility. (Already in Russia at March).
@threadreaderapp Unroll

More from Government

How does a government put a legislation on 'hold'? Is there any constitutional mechanism for the executive to 'pause' a validly passed legislation? Genuine Koshan.


So a committee of 'wise men/women' selected by the SC will stand in judgement over the law passed by


Here is the thing - a law can be stayed based on usual methods, it can be held unconstitutional based on violation of the Constitution. There is no shortcut to this based on the say so of even a large number of people, merely because they are loud.


Tomorrow can all the income tax payers also gather up at whichever maidan and ask for repealing the income tax law? It hurts us and we can protest quite loudly.

How can a law be stayed or over-turned based on the nuisance value of the protestors? It is anarchy to allow that.

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.