1/THREAD: NEW DoD SECURITY CLEARANCE REFORM WILL HELP THOUSANDS

In little known move, on 1/14, then Acting USDIS @EzraACohen issued ground breaking memo to significantly reform @DeptofDefense #securityclearance program & enhance individual due process & increase transparency.

2/Many ppl have been working for decades to effect these changes & with one swoop of pen, it is FINALLY now official policy. I cannot speak highly enough of what was accomplished & it needs to be known.
3/Memo follows through on what President Eisenhower started 60 years ago w/Executive Order 10865, still in effect today, what President Clinton created w/EO 12968 in 1995, & what SECDEF Bob Gates ordered in 2011. DoD must now consolidate, centralize & unify all existing
4/admin processes at every component, incl DoD IC agencies (DIA, NSA, NRO, etc) for unfavorable #securityclearance eligibility determinations (denial/revocation) into single process handled by Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals (DOHA), which has been hearing cases for decades.
5/Memo extends due process protections & grants authority to DOHA to hear not only defense contractor cases but also all @DeptofDefense civilians and military members, and importantly all Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) appeals, which it previously could not do.
6/Thus, for example, previously those denied clearance at @DefenseIntel would have two levels of internal appeals. First appeal in writing & w/personal appearance. But only client & single attorney could appear. No support witnesses.
7/Often very difficult to gain access to evidence as well. Second level appeal would be handled in writing only & secretly. Not necessarily conducive for real due process.
8/Now, after this memo, DOHA will independently hear and adjudicate second level appeal instead. This will happen at all @DeptofDefense agencies now, many of which agreed w/DOHA Judge’s recommended rulings up to 96% of time anyway. Centralization saves money, resources & time.
9/DOHA is gold standard of clearance due process. Their hearing process features experienced administrative judges, lawyers on both sides, witnesses, cross-examination, access to evidence, submission of exhibits, and opening and closing statements; all aimed at getting to truth.
10/I have appeared before its Administrative Judges dozens of times in last 20+ years in defending clients facing loss of eligibility. All of its decisions are publicly available online at https://t.co/djPLPXxBLq.
11/Frustratingly, there are some within @DeptofDefense who continue to fight against this memo. Opposition is primarily coming from IC components who do not want to lose jurisdiction & are scared of external (even within DoD) & independent oversight.
12/Honestly, and with all due respect, every argument I have heard either misunderstands existing system or is completely false, baseless or absurd.
13/This memo is not political in any way & nothing it creates will serve to facilitate granting of clearances to individuals or groups who should otherwise not receive access. It merely strengthens existing due process rights to maximize individual protections more broadly.
14/The DOHA system has worked for decades & ensures Executive Branch (Govt) decision makers - experts on eligibility to classified information - know all relevant facts before rendering informed decision. Who would not want that?
15/Agencies still control suspension decisions so any true problem can always be addressed. Importantly, agencies will have govt lawyer rep’ing their interests before DoD judge & can fully participate in hearing, whether through live testimony or documentary exhibit submissions.
16/Govt’s interests are FULLY protected. After all, this is still Executive Branch issuing all the decisions. DOHA judges are security professionals who have been doing this for decades.
17/In fact, if DOHA judge renders favorable determination for individual, govt agency can appeal that decision to a DoD appeal board of three judges. Executive Branch interests are ALWAYS protected.
18/Importantly, NOTHING in this memo changes any adjudicative guidelines or standards. Those remain same as they have for years, through both DEM & GOP administrations.

Current eligibility determination guidelines can be found here: https://t.co/AaqPh8SJou
19/I have been handling these cases for 25+ years. I have taught DC Bar CLE class on topic since 2006 & I have testified as expert witness before Congress & court. Reform long overdue & supports rule of law & due process. Colleagues I have spoken to are ecstatic memo was issued.
20/And many who served at highest levels of govt as experts in this field agree. Here is but just one example from @FitzJohnP:
21/“This reform step is overdue. It will both unify and fortify the handling of these important security clearance appeal cases across all security offices in the department. This action should make outcomes in such cases more consistent and more transparent. Transparency and ...
22/national security issues may seem like strange bedfellows, but confidence in security is enhanced when processes and decisions are made in the light of day and understood to be fair. Defense agency security offices likely will feel they lose some control with this change, ...
23/but I would suggest that instead these offices are gaining a great partner. The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals is as professional and experienced an office as you will find in government, ...
24/and anyone dealing with them on these matters should be confident of a fair outcome.”

John P. Fitzpatrick (@FitzJohnP)
Former NSC Senior Director, former Director of ISOO, former Assistant Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Security
25/You can read memo here on @DeptofDefense website:

https://t.co/hZSyn1jMj6
END/I encourage media to report on this incredible new policy change. Please contact me at [email protected] if further info desired. And by all means, ask @DeptofDefense questions.

@WhiteHouse & @JoeBiden should be 100% in support of #RuleOfLaw & #DueProcess.
You can't get more experienced an attorney than @JohnBerryDC in handling #securityclearance cases.

https://t.co/xi4bYkJCeM

More from Government

Long thread: Because I couldn’t find anything comprehensive, I’m just going to post everything I’ve seen in the news/Twitter about Trump’s activities related to the Jan 6th insurrection. I think the timing & context of his actions/inactions will matter a lot for a senate trial.

12/12: The earlier DC protest over the electoral college vote during clearly inspired Jan 6th. On Dec 12th, he tweeted: “Wow! Thousands of people forming in Washington (D.C.) for Stop the Steal. Didn’t know about this, but I’ll be seeing them! #MAGA.”


12/19: Trump announces the Jan. 6th event by tweeting, “Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!” Immediately, insurrectionists begin to discuss the “Wild Protest.” Just 2 days later, this UK political analyst predicts the violence


12/26-27: Trump announces his participation on Twitter. On Dec. 29, the FBI sends out a nationwide bulletin warning legislatures about attacks https://t.co/Lgl4yk5aO1


1/1: Trump tweets the time of his protest. Then he retweets “The calvary is coming” on Jan. 6!” Sounds like a war? About this time, the FBI begins visiting right wing extremists to tell them not to go--does the FBI tell the president? https://t.co/3OxnB2AHdr
Labour Grandees are listed in Sir Keir Starmer's colleague Jeffrey Epstein's ''Little Black Book''; Blair, Mandelson and Alastair Campbell. COINCIDENTLY, Keir Starmer and some of the same people have connections to ANOTHER of the worlds most prolific peadophiles. #StarmerOut


Starmer failed to bring charges against Jimmy Savile for paedophilia. The decision was made despite the Crown Prosecution Service receiving substantial evidence of his crimes from witnesses and victims several years before Savile died in 2011. #StarmerOut
https://t.co/PNyX5uSAkw


With a past like hers, Margaret Hodge might show a bit more humility.
In the Eighties Hodge was aware of previous child sex abuse in the care homes for which she was responsible, and did nothing about it. #LabourLeaks #StarmerOut

As leader of Islington Council, a post she held from 1982-92, Margaret Hodge was aware of previous, horrendous child sex abuse in the care homes for which she was responsible, and did nothing about it. #LabourLeaks #StarmerOut #CSA

She was guilty of rather more than a casual failure of oversight. In an open letter to the BBC after it investigated a range of monstrous abuse (child prostitution, torture, alleged murders), Hodge libelled one of its victims as “seriously disturbed”. #LabourLeaks #StarmerOut

You May Also Like

महाभारत की कहानी कौन नहीं जानता।लेकिन क्या आपको पता है कि महाभारत के ज्यादातर पात्र किसी न किसी श्राप में फंसे थे।अगर ये श्राप न होते तो कदाचित महाभारत की कहानी कुछ और होती।हिन्दु पौराणिक ग्रंथों में विभिन्न श्रापों का वर्णन मिलता है व हर श्राप के पीछे कोई कहानी अवश्य होती है।


आइए आज जानते हैं महाभारत कथा में वर्णित कुछ श्रापों के बारे में।

1) राजा पाण्डु को ऋषि किन्दम का श्राप

एकबार महाराज पाण्डु शिकार खेलने वन गए।झाडियों के पीछे कुछ हिल रहा था। मृग है सोचकर राजा ने बाण चलाया जो जाकर ऋषि किन्दम और उनकी पत्नी को लगा।वे दोनो रति-क्रीड़ा में लिप्त थे।

जब राजा ने उन्हें देखा तो बहुत दुखी हुए कि ये मुझसे क्या पाप हो गया।बहुत क्षमा याचना के बाद भी किन्दम ऋषि ने पाण्डु को श्राप दे दिया कि जब भी वो किसी स्त्री को काम भावना से स्पर्श करेंगे उसी क्षण उनकी मृत्यु हो जाएगी।पश्चाताप करने, वे सिंहासन पे अन्धे राजा धृतराष्ट्र को बैठाकर...


..स्वयं अपनी रानियों कुंती व माद्री के साथ वन चले गए।पांडवों का जन्म भी कुंती को ऋषि दुर्वासा द्वारा दिए गए मंत्र से हुआ था जिसमे किसी भी देव का स्मरण कर उस देव से कुंती,पुत्र प्राप्त कर सकती थी।एक बार माद्री पे मोहित हो जब पांडु ने उसे स्पर्श किया,उसी क्षण पांडु की मृत्यु होगयी।


2) उर्वशी का अर्जुन को श्राप

महाभारत युद्ध से पहले जब अर्जुन दिव्यास्त्र प्राप्त करने स्वर्ग गए तो वहां उर्वशी नाम की अप्सरा उन पर मोहित हो गयी। अर्जुन ने जब उन्हें अपनी माता के समान बताया तो यह सुनकर उर्वशी क्रोधित हो गयी और अर्जुन को श्राप दे डाला कि तुम नपुंसक की भांति...