How do so many “opportunities” just magically arise for these people? 🤷🏼♂️🤦♂️ https://t.co/3hZJqDmyfJ
— Jesse \u201cEpstein&Ghislaine families=WEF&4IR\u201d Matchey (@JesseMatchey) October 14, 2021
Read this 2018, ID2020 article
“Immunization: an entry point for digital identity”
Then listen to Klaus Schwab’s son, Olivier, talk about WEF’s public-private partnership being the start of GAVI...
https://t.co/CQeFvH9Iql https://t.co/TW6G5Fthgc
How do so many “opportunities” just magically arise for these people? 🤷🏼♂️🤦♂️ https://t.co/3hZJqDmyfJ
WHO Digital Documentation of COVID-19 Certificates Vaccination Status
— Jesse \u201cEpstein&Ghislaine families=WEF&4IR\u201d Matchey (@JesseMatchey) September 1, 2021
(\u201cused for continuity of care or as proof of vaccination for purposes other than health care\u201d)https://t.co/AeeXJSBroj https://t.co/xqGgif6sWj pic.twitter.com/EVLDdI5756
\U0001f9d0https://t.co/cvwJ8HOAJI pic.twitter.com/WicUzaIXIT
— Jesse \u201cEpstein&Ghislaine families=WEF&4IR\u201d Matchey (@JesseMatchey) August 22, 2021
Global Broadband w/Tedros.
They **wanted** 🦠to spread https://t.co/rbeeOXfJLk
\U0001f9f5In \u201871, Rockefeller\u2019s Club of Rome conducted a study called \u201cThe Limits to Growth\u201d, which asserted overpopulation would exceed capacity of\U0001f30efinite resources
— Jesse \u201cEpstein&Ghislaine families=WEF&4IR\u201d Matchey (@JesseMatchey) October 11, 2021
Did u know CNN founder&UN Ted Turner donated $billion to Ghislaine Maxwell\u2019s TerraMar partner, \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f3Amir Dossal, to manage? pic.twitter.com/wz7tFpY1BN
Amir Dossal is appointed to the UN covid team. He has a partnership with the IOT/VA of transhuman inc. He was 1/5 on Ghislaine\u2019s TerraMar board. He is on the Humpty Dumpty institute with Epstein\u2019s brother, Mark Epstein
— Jesse \u201cEpstein&Ghislaine families=WEF&4IR\u201d Matchey (@JesseMatchey) April 10, 2021
How is this a thing? What plausible explanation is there? pic.twitter.com/52T7HJWaoP
🥸
https://t.co/L4aOMYlwxI
-July 2019
https://t.co/ym40DNPNB7
Interesting, we got professor pants-down’s 🌎 economy wrecking projections...and Imperial college is also behind UKFires Climate Change report
https://t.co/4foiUPoQCF
6/13/19 - UN&WEF sign MOU agreement
— Jesse \u201cEpstein&Ghislaine families=WEF&4IR\u201d Matchey (@JesseMatchey) October 20, 2021
10/25/19 - \u201cWe are not prepared for a pandemic...Trump unprepared...\u201d
11/15/19 - WEF&WHO \u201cIt was great to meet...accelerate health & development Global UN Goals\u201d
1/15/20 - \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8\U0001f1e8\U0001f1f3Trade deal signed w/Pandemic clause added days before
\U0001f9a0date?\U0001f9d0 https://t.co/na631hI2d2 pic.twitter.com/wFquBJ0BCc
3/14/19 https://t.co/n9pnn1zhs5
"No vaccine, no school."
— World Economic Forum (@wef) March 14, 2019
\U0001f4d5 Read more: https://t.co/6HdPlWco2p #antivax #vaccinations pic.twitter.com/gYB2YFLdH9
You May Also Like
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
