Cash Breakout Stocks-
1. Galaxysurf
2. Asiantiles
3. Kabraextru
4. Tdpowersys
More from Mr. Chartist
NSE:IRCTC 3040
1. Still 200/400 point movement left as per Ascending Triangle Pattern.
2. Stock perfectly moved according to the classic pattern.
3. Next level to watch now 3500-4000
4. Support near 2600-2800 https://t.co/VrUhS85Rml
1. Still 200/400 point movement left as per Ascending Triangle Pattern.
2. Stock perfectly moved according to the classic pattern.
3. Next level to watch now 3500-4000
4. Support near 2600-2800 https://t.co/VrUhS85Rml
NSE:IRCTC 1775 +2.78%
— Mr. Chartist (@Mr_Chartist) February 26, 2021
-Cup and Handle breakout
-Support at 1600/1650
-Next levels at 1900/2000/2100++#TA pic.twitter.com/LxpPTI0rB6
More from Galaxysurfactant
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".