1/9

Comment: good morning world. Just thinking as typing here. It's not a habit starting doing this, yet bear with me please. It can happen.
To me, this isn't issue of right or left (to extremes) per se. Yet, is there a failing?
I think so.
Sat, thinking...it occurred-->

2/9

that i am looking to find solutions. And following, that I am and think alone. (Its the way it is here.) So, not being in a constant or really, anytime chat to talk of. I wonder ... as i am here-and-now, what can be done?

We're in it, aren't we!
Indeed we are.
Viewing -->
3/9

this and that somewhat more than reading. I get a picture of say, excited distress in many. Okay, not all? But meaning here, it doesn't take to act to be the way i may have you envisage it. Not violently. I just think of a state to this. But, who does it encompass?

Well-->
4/9

if I'm on the right line to thinking. Then this is a true and utter MF. Not just contemporary from what I glean. Though exceptional today.
If we, those who are concerned to resolve peacefully. If we don't get a grip. I think it's then Nature makes humanity walk the plank.-->
5/9

It won't matter where or who one is. I think this is clear.

Anyhow, we're also clever in the main. Categorizing individuals, groupings and all that. It won't cut the mustard now. But i see differences, i do.
Now and again, more and more frequently, it occurs that -->
6/9

the call for the outreach and grouping of the peaceful or even "decent" people is subsumed. And subsumed in yes, chatter of excited distress amongst even the very ones they all are. No matter how outwardly calm, how knowledgable, how basically functional and/or level -->
7/9

headed or not. Subsumed is what i suggest. And we know, like it or not, that not getting it together to mindfully solve this. Is to be carried off by our ineptitude in the face of even peaceful issue. Or, by the Planet's situation we're not then handling well enough.-->
8/9

Like it or not, stewardship is the (unfortuante) ask of Nature upon us. I think?!
For each and all, any playtime is over on this planet. And as this means shepherding the violent (each and every generation to follow also), then the peaceful best get a grip. And find a way.
9/9

I can't think more here. I'd ramble to be honest.
I do know conflict isn't in this to be me. That's my baseline. I'll argue, blah blah. Yet I'll walk away too. So, who are the violent who would harm nevertheless? What's the argument? What's their beef?

It's this to deal to
End/

I'm so sorry if you read this far. And haven't been satisfied by content. A suggestion is to coalesce somehow.

Somehow we must sustain and improve in peace. Sheperd the violent away from such acts, and steward this entire planet.

https://t.co/dM2vIktetq

More from For later read

Daily Bookmarks to GAVNet 02/12/2021

Quantum causal loops

https://t.co/emX8OxKPl0

#loops #quantum

Large-scale commodity farming accelerating climate change in the Amazon

https://t.co/v3gA7OTP9E

#ClimateChange #forest #farm

Collapsed glaciers increase Third Pole uncertainties: Downstream lakes may merge within a decade

https://t.co/huAma56KeB

#glacier #lakes #ClimateChange

From trash to treasure: Silicon waste finds new use in Li-ion batteries

https://t.co/TkxKFDQMC6

#batteries #treasure #silicon #trash
the whole point of Dunks was you could go cop them at VIM whenever you wanted for $65. this shit is like having to enter a raffle to buy milk.


like seriously why not make a ton more of them if they're gonna be so sought-after? they land at outlets? so? nike still makes money off that.

the only reason to keep making them so limited is that they KNOW all that matters is the profit on the flip and if they were readily available FEWER people would want them, not more

the whole system is super broken, but it's just gonna go the way it goes, because at this point it all caters to the secondary market. the only reason Nike can sell Jordan 1s for $200 is because the people buying them can flip them for $500

adjusted for inflation, a $65 AJ1 in 1985 is like $160—and modern-day AJ1s are made from cheaper materials in factories staffed by cheaper workers. they don't HAVE to be $200 retail. but the secondary market nuked the whole concept of what sneakers are "worth"

You May Also Like