This thread will briefly explain my stock selection process for trading

1) At EOD, short list stocks which are in bullish formations or bullish patterns on higher box sizes or time frames. On monthly and weekly time frames or 1% 2% and 3% box sizes
2/n

2) from this, short list stocks that are probable breakout candidates. Here I look for follow through to bullish patterns like super pattern , 💯 pole, turtle Breakout , rare occurrence , bear traps etc
3/n
3) From this list check relative strength against nifty 50 and short list stronger candidates.
Check for price and volume breakouts in candlestick charts on daily timeframes for confirming the momentum
4/n
There are many ways to achieve this. I have built a system in TradePoint from @Definedge for short listing the candidates. I run fusion matrix to find stronger candidates. The idea for this got from one of the weekly newsletters of @Definedge .
5/n
For finding momentum , developed a system in OHLC charts where I check for price and volume breakout for last 5 days, some EMA checks and RSI levels, supertrend etc

More from DTBhat

#TATAPOWER futures on daily charts, finally breaks out of the tight range. Open counts are at 150 and 187. https://t.co/lPshkD3FeA

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x