#PORTFOLIO UPDATE
CDSL
CMP: 1258.55
One of my long term PORTFOLIO STOCK is getting ready for the next phase.
Will be a good point to add more quantity. https://t.co/KaidnjSWpY
A lot of friends ask for stocks that they can invest for next 5 years. I personally believe and personally invested into
— TECHVESTOR (@AshrafZaman3) May 23, 2021
1. IEX
2 CDSL
3. IRCTC
4. NAZARA TECHNOLOGIES
Please do not take this as an investment recommendation. Also my entry price is lower.#investing pic.twitter.com/vKBLV9u4mL
More from Cdsl
#cdsl now trading at 817 from 789..
More fireworks yet to come above 827 BO
This is power of AOV analysis feature.
More fireworks yet to come above 827 BO
This is power of AOV analysis feature.
#Areaofvalue analysis#CDSL
— SSStockAlerts (@ssstockalerts) May 6, 2021
Buy near 21 SMA support. This stock respects 21 SMA for 84% time. Backtested for last 1 year.
Candle size is getting smaller and volume also less then avg volume.
Any time it can reverse from here.
Help/Supporthttps://t.co/rRCfjf3KIi pic.twitter.com/KGyyAAQ1tV
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
