https://t.co/CKDPp8gWdG
1/ Thread – LOCKDOWNS – WHAT WE'VE DONE
My work is sometimes criticized for not discussing the merits of lockdown—perhaps even exculpating western leaders by blaming the CCP. Others know better. This thread is for the victims of lockdown, the greatest crime of the 21st century.
https://t.co/CKDPp8gWdG
https://t.co/DsGQSdZlVa
https://t.co/fO6BGtknfo
https://t.co/Unxz1stmCi
https://t.co/e4gQF8Z3ss
https://t.co/Gd9tHYiBZ6
https://t.co/BHfombEVEx
https://t.co/fxDs5SHQOd
https://t.co/a6Tnr61tMy
https://t.co/dTVdeFRGXW
https://t.co/mGHUSHDUV8
https://t.co/kMNgA7VItE
https://t.co/aemvlzmPbN
https://t.co/K0V5L024id
https://t.co/OVTn9UCHDm
https://t.co/oNGHAijv5j
https://t.co/jTTINTA6lD
https://t.co/FrIYLOKviU
https://t.co/BhQpmQqQyS
https://t.co/2eAcvmb5k3
https://t.co/PGLAOLt0rR
https://t.co/FO9a615E0j
https://t.co/dKhu6AZufx
1/ THREAD - EVERYTHING IS FAKE
— Michael P Senger (@MichaelPSenger) September 21, 2020
An open letter to Xi Jinping.
When your VP visited Wuhan, your oppressed citizens shouted \u201cfake, fake, everything is fake!\u201d I\u2019ve identified irregularities in your pandemic response that lend weight to their protest.https://t.co/lryd0QOHXl
More from Category c19
“15 days to slow the spread” began one year ago. It was March 2020, the Year of the Rat. Never was any year more fitting of the name. Never in history have the people been betrayed so callously, flagrantly and absolutely by their alleged leaders.
2/ They were betrayed by their WHO
3/ and their national health
4/ They were betrayed by medical
Despite ignorance by many in the West, this article by The Lancet is a powerful endorsement of China\u2019s successful pandemic response. Hate to read stories by those paparazzi journalists who are experts at spinning but have little knowledge of science. https://t.co/Q8rKwwTPsI pic.twitter.com/436BEmx9nl
— Chen Weihua \uff08\u9648\u536b\u534e\uff09 (@chenweihua) October 16, 2020
5/ and their peer
6/ Eurosurveillance, a journal whose editors coincidentally includes Mr. Drosten, takes only a single day for the peer review process and publishes the hastily compiled PCR protocol on January 22. https://t.co/cWX3UdKeID
— Pace \U0001f642 (@theotherphilipp) February 25, 2021
2/: These so-called ‘Doctors’ Trial’ focused on physicians who conducted #inhumane and #unethical human experiments in German concentration camps, in addition to those who were involved in over 3,500,000 sterilizations of German citizens. (the picture shows doctors/criminals)
3/: Ten points of the code were given in the section of the verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments". They can be found in detail on the following website:
4/: Point #1 means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, or deceit.
5/: Using an insufficiently-tested vaccine on humans is unethical. However, as long as people voluntarily consent to receive the vaccine, being informed about all risks, everything is OK. Doing this with force, however, is against the Nuremberg Code.
Important - share: Camera footage out of care homes (USA, corrected), provided by @RobertKennedyJr's team. You can clearly see: Collateral Damages, Army assisting, force, death.
— Bobby Rajesh Malhotra \u30c4 (@Bobby_Network) February 17, 2021
Worldwide phenomen, also in Germany:https://t.co/GV7gqiPl1u
21st Century Nuremberg Trials-material pic.twitter.com/wPekgPYHIR
You May Also Like
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.