The China E-commerce market has grown rapidly over the past decade and is poised to continue to grow for the coming decades.
$DADA and $JD
$DADA's goal is to empower stores to have the ability to deliver everything to their customers within an hour on-demand. $JD owns 51% of $DADA. Here is a thread on the things you need to know as a $DADA or $JD investor.
Let's get started 👇👇
The China E-commerce market has grown rapidly over the past decade and is poised to continue to grow for the coming decades.
Despite strong growth, Chinese E-commerce share has only taken up 24.9% of the total retail sales in consumer goods in 2020. There is still great potential in the coming 5-10 years in Chinese E-commerce.
The first phrase of E-commerce is when products are delivered in days, the second phrase delivered under 24 hours, and the third phrase, ‘on-demand’, products are being delivered within an hour. China is currently entering the third phase.
China has experienced rapid growth in total on-demand delivery orders over the past couple years. As of 2019, there are more than 18 billion total on-demand orders delivered, a growth of 36.93%.
Food delivery orders take up most online delivery orders. However, there is a trend that on-demand delivery orders are widening to all other kinds of products.
According to Statista, China has the largest userbase, over 400 million users, of on-demand food delivery services in 2019. A growth of approximately 20%. The China on-demand food delivery market is valued at $51.5 billion USD in 2020.
Supermarket retail GMV is expected to grow to 3.6 trillion RMB (560 billion USD) in 2023. The supermarket O2O (online to offline, way of describing on-demand delivery) penetration is only 1.4% in 2019 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 70%.
Covid has created strong tailwind and accelerated on-demand delivery, as more people have experienced the conveniency provided by on-demand delivery. Covid has creating a lot of growth especially in 2nd and 3rd tier cities in China.
With all that said, here is where $DADA comes in. $DADA is a leading platform for local on-demand delivery in China. $DADA runs DADA Now, a leading local on-demand delivery platform for merchants and individuals, and JDDJ (JD to Home), one of China’s largest
Dada Now is an open on-demand delivery platform serving both merchants and individuals. DADA Now aims to deliver an integrated full channel on-demand delivery service within an hour for logistics companies, chain businesses, SMEs, and individuals.
JDDJ, was established by $JD, but later spinoff and merged with DADA in 2016, where JD acquired 47.4% of DADA. JDDJ is a local on-demand platform that connects retailers and brand owners directly with consumers. JDDJ is like UberEATS, but for groceries and
JDDJ aims to be a ‘cloud supermarket and cloud department stores’ that can delivered any product within an hour by aggregating all physical supermarkets/stores.
JDDJ is the largest supermarket O2O platform. Almost all supermarket, Walmart, YongHui Superstores, China Resources Vanguard and 100 thousand more stores are all on JDDJ. More than 60% of the top 100 supermarket has partnership with $DADA.
$DADA with JDDJ’s 40 million users and $JD app’s 400 million AAU, acts as a channel that increase traffic for traditional physical stores. $DADA allows physical stores to have the ability to deliver products within an hour in a cost-effective way.
$DADA’s CEO, Phillip Kuai, has promised that DADA will never be involved in selling the products themselves and compete with traditional retailers. $DADA will only help traditional retailers to digitalize and fulfil on-demand delivery.
$DADA uses smart distribution of orders to determine the best route for couriers, dynamic scheduling, real time orders volume to increase the efficiency of each courier and delivery.
Like UberEATS, the biggest value proposition of $DADA is time saving. A $DADA service costs around $5-$15ish RMB ($0.77 to $2.32 USD), allows customers to save time and ‘opportunity costs’ that are wasted for daily shopping while not paying a hefty price.
Although $JD has the best logistics team in $JD Logistics, $JD still faces issues during 618 and double 11, China’s shopping festival. $DADA’s crowdsourcing model can provide more workers and assist $JD logistics during these spikes. CONTINUE
$DADA uses big data, AI, software, and technologies, to achieve an average delivery time of around 30 minutes, matching intra-city orders within 1 minute, decrease picking time to as little as 3 minutes.
Currently, most on-demand delivery cost around $5-$15 RMB (around 0.7 to 2.2 USD), and only takes around 0.5-2 hours on average to be delivered.
In China, customers care about the delivery time, quality, and price the most for an on-demand O2O delivery service.
Due to most customer reviews on DADA now and JDDJ being in Chinese, I will try to summarise some of my main takeaways from browsing the customer reviews. I must admit, the overall reviews have been overwhelmingly bad for JDDJ and to a lesser extent DADA Now.
These suggests that $DADA is not performing well, or at least could done better, in the two most important thing, ‘delivery time’ and ‘product quality’, that a customer valued for O2O on-demand delivery.
Meituan and https://t.co/HGZujGbc93 are JDDJ's main competitors in the on-demand delivery market. Although $DADA has emphasized that they do not compete directly with Meituan and https://t.co/HGZujGbc93, as those two focuses more on food deliveries,
$DADA's revenue has reached 5.74 billion RMB (890 million USD) in 2020. $DADA’s revenue has experienced strong growth with a CARG rate of 67.7% over the last three years and a 58.8% growth for 2020.
$DADA earns around 50% of revenue from $JD and 14% from $WMT. These lack of income diversification, should not be concerning in the short run, as $JD and $WMT each holds 51% and around 10% of $DADA. However, in the LR, $DADA must expand further.
Out of $DADA’s gross profit, operating income and net income, only gross profit has improved over the past 4 years. This point to the concern that all ridehail/on-demand delivery platform has in common, when will or how can these platforms be profitable? CON
$DADA’s expenses as a %of revenue is high (131.8% in 2020). Operations, which includes the heaviest expense, labour, by itself makes up 82.2% of revenue. Although the decreasing trend is great, $DADA still have a long way to go before profitability.
$DADA as a Chinese local on-demand delivery platform has enjoyed and should continue to enjoy the growing on-demand delivery market. However, while $DADA’s top line continue to increase, $DADA’s bottom line improvement still remains to be seen.