Part of the problem with the debate around schools is the obscure nature of the accusations against teachers

What exactly are teachers being accused of?

...

Is it that they are refusing to do their job? I.e. lazy

Simply untrue. They will still be teaching remotely, which is often more difficult than in person

If they can't do that because of lack of tech that's partly the govt's fault and it should have been better prepared by now
Is it that there is a low risk of teachers catching the virus? I.e. mountain out of a molehill.

AFAIK virus risk in schools broadly matches the wider population (happy to be corrected), which is rising rapidly

If there's increased risk everywhere, there is in schools too
Plus, no other group is being asked to remain in close contact with large numbers of potentially infectious people, i.e. children in this case, with little to no PPE

In some schools it is banned, in others simply frowned upon
Plus, 1 million people work in schools in England alone: https://t.co/UObIGpqszQ

Add to that almost 9 million pupils: https://t.co/DFV8X3Z7Cv

That's a lot of people (~18% of the population in England) mixing closely, even with mitigations in place, and should concern us all
Do teachers want to actively harm the futures of the children they're supposed to be helping?

This is a malicious accusation against people who dedicate their lives to not just teaching but providing a whole range of pastoral care to children. I give it no value.
Should teachers be expected to take risks the rest of us aren't as part of their job?

Personally, I don't think so

If there were sufficient testing and mandatory use of PPE until widespread vaccination, the level of risk might be different (again govt shld shoulder blame)
Some people seem to expect teachers to take risks they don't have to take themselves

Some may be comfortable working in schools, that's a personal choice

But the right to be safe and secure at work is basic and not too much to ask, not even (in fact, especially) in a pandemic
And you'll notice none of this has anything to do with whether children are at a risk of getting serious disease (as we all know, on the whole they aren't)

But they can catch it, carry it and spread it - that's what matters here
The govt is deflecting blame onto teachers for their own serious shortcomings

Whether school preparedness for online learning, mass testing in schools or vaccine rollout, not to mention slow and poor decision-making which has contributed to such high rates of infection

More from All

You May Also Like

कुंडली में 12 भाव होते हैं। कैसे ज्योतिष द्वारा रोग के आंकलन करते समय कुंडली के विभिन्न भावों से गणना करते हैं आज इस पर चर्चा करेंगे।
कुण्डली को कालपुरुष की संज्ञा देकर इसमें शरीर के अंगों को स्थापित कर उनसे रोग, रोगेश, रोग को बढ़ाने घटाने वाले ग्रह


रोग की स्थिति में उत्प्रेरक का कार्य करने वाले ग्रह, आयुर्वेदिक/ऐलोपैथी/होमियोपैथी में से कौन कारगर होगा इसका आँकलन, रक्त विकार, रक्त और आपरेशन की स्थिति, कौन सा आंतरिक या बाहरी अंग प्रभावित होगा इत्यादि गणना करने में कुंडली का प्रयोग किया जाता है।


मेडिकल ज्योतिष में आज के समय में Dr. K. S. Charak का नाम निर्विवाद रूप से प्रथम स्थान रखता है। उनकी लिखी कई पुस्तकें आज इस क्षेत्र में नए ज्योतिषों का मार्गदर्शन कर रही हैं।
प्रथम भाव -
इस भाव से हम व्यक्ति की रोगप्रतिरोधक क्षमता, सिर, मष्तिस्क का विचार करते हैं।


द्वितीय भाव-
दाहिना नेत्र, मुख, वाणी, नाक, गर्दन व गले के ऊपरी भाग का विचार होता है।
तृतीय भाव-
अस्थि, गला,कान, हाथ, कंधे व छाती के आंतरिक अंगों का शुरुआती भाग इत्यादि।

चतुर्थ भाव- छाती व इसके आंतरिक अंग, जातक की मानसिक स्थिति/प्रकृति, स्तन आदि की गणना की जाती है


पंचम भाव-
जातक की बुद्धि व उसकी तीव्रता,पीठ, पसलियां,पेट, हृदय की स्थिति आंकलन में प्रयोग होता है।

षष्ठ भाव-
रोग भाव कहा जाता है। कुंडली मे इसके तत्कालिक भाव स्वामी, कालपुरुष कुंडली के स्वामी, दृष्टि संबंध, रोगेश की स्थिति, रोगेश के नक्षत्र औऱ रोगेश व भाव की डिग्री इत्यादि।
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.