๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ | ๐—œ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐—ท ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—œ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ท๐—ผ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฎ - ๐—”๐—ป ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ~ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ - ๐—œ๐—œ

๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ - ๐—œ๐—œ ~๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ & ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€

Read Complete Thread to Understand

Continued [1/N]

If you are Reading this Thread 1st time then Please Read Part -1 of this Thread Before Continuing to This Part

๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ - ๐—œ ~ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€

https://t.co/k8QVKUvApJ

[2/N]
Documentary Facts of Taj Mahal :

Shahjahanโ€™s own court chronicle, the Badshahnama, admits (PN 403, vol 1) that a grand mansion of unique splendor, capped with a dome was taken from the Jaipur Maharaja Jaisigh for Mumtazโ€™s Burial & the building was known as Raja Mansinghโ€™s Palace
Here is the picture of the Badshahnama Page 402 & 403 Taken from Government of Indiaโ€™s National Archives

Read English translation of the contents from line 21 of page 402 to line 41 on page 403 of Badshahnama

[4/N]
Many historians try to convince that Shah Jahan purchased a piece of land from Raja Jai Singh and erected Taj Mahal on that land. But the lines 29 and 30 onpage 403 of Vol-I of Badshahnama says something Else if you Translate it from experts

Read Attached Pic

[5/N]
Many Muslim chroniclers have described the times of Shah Jahan & Aurangzeb( referpic for Names(, But in none of them even mentioning of Taj Mahal, except Badshahnama by Lahori & that too as a palace of Jai Singh

Very Strange Right ?

[6/N]
Prince Aurangzebโ€™s letter to his father, Shahjahan :

The Letter is recorded in atleast three chronicles titled `Aadaab-e-Alamgiriโ€™, `Yadgarnamaโ€™, and the `Muruqqa-i-Akbarabadiโ€™ (edited by Said Ahmed, Agra, 1931, page 43, footnote 2)

[7/N]
Asper the ASI & Board @ Taj Mahal it's Built in Between 1631-1653, But In Above Lettter Dated 1652 Aurangzeb himself complains to Shahjahan that extensive repairs that are in need of being done on the Taj Mahal

Why an New Structure Requires Such an Extensive Repair Work ?

[8/N]
Two orders from Shahjahan dated Dec 18, 1633 - R.176 and 177 Regarding the Taj building complex to Raja Jai Singh

The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur retains these orders in his personal `Kapad Dwaraโ€™ collection, But rulers of Jaipur was ashamed to make the document public

[9/N]
Exchange offer ? ๐Ÿค”

" Raja Jai Singh, and are hereby handed over and transferred to his ownershipโ€“in exchange for the mansion (haveli)."

Read more in Attached Pic

[10/N]
'Taj Mahal built on our land, Shah Jahan captured it': BJP MP Diya Kumari

She claims that they have Documents related to it
Does she is Taking About Same Documents which is in Tweet [9/N] of Thread ?

[11/N]
Watch Video of Her Statement in Bellow Link

https://t.co/mh05nTsOQ5
The Rajasthan State archives at Bikaner preserve three other โ€˜firmansโ€™ (orders) addressed by Shahjahan to the Jaipurโ€™s ruler Jaisingh ordering the latter to supply marble (for Mumtazโ€™s grave and koranic grafts) from his Makranna quarris, & stone cutters.

[12/N]
Moreover, the three mention neither the Taj Mahal, nor Mumtaz nor the burial. The cost and the quantity of the stone also are not mentioned This proves that an insignificant quantity of marble was needed just for some superficial tinkering and tampering with the Taj Mahal

[13/N]
European Visitorโ€™s Accounts :

Tavernier, a French jeweller has recorded in his travel memoirs that Shahjahan purposely buried Mumtaz near the Taz-i-Makan

[14/N]
Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra recorded in 1632 (within only a year of Mumtazโ€™s death) that `the places of note in & around Agra included Taj-e-Mahalโ€™s tomb, gardens & bazaars
He therefore confirms that the Tajmahal had been a noteworthy building even before Shahjahan
De Laet, a Dutch official has listed Mansinghโ€™s Palace about a mile from Agra fort, as an outstanding building of pre shahjahanโ€™s time. Shahjahanโ€™s court chronicle, the Badshahnama records, Mumtazโ€™s burial in the same Mansinghโ€™s palace.

[16/N]
Bernier, a contemporary French visitor has noted that non muslimโ€™s were barred entry into the basement which contained a dazzling light.

Obviously, he reffered to the silver doors, gold railing, the gem studded lattice and strings of pearl hanging over Shivaโ€™s idol.

[17/N]
Johan Albert Mandelslo, who describes life in agra in 1638 in detail (in his `Voyages and Travels to West-Indiesโ€™), makes no mention of the Tajmahal being under constuction though it is commonly erringly asserted or assumed that the Taj was being built from 1631 to 1653

[18/N]
Sanskrit Inscription :

A Sanskrit inscription too supports the conclusion that the Taj originated as a Shiva temple. Wrongly termed as the Bateshwar inscription (currently preserved on the top floor of the Lucknow museum), it Referes

[19/N]
Missing Elephants as per, Thomas Twinning, records

[20/N]
Records Donโ€™t Exist !!

[21/N]
Prophet Mohammad has ordained that the burial spot of a Muslim should be inconspicuous & must not be marked by even a single tombstone

In flagrant violation of this the Tajmahal has one grave in the basement & another in the first-floor chamber both ascribed to Mumtaz

[22/N]
Tomb Is The Grave, Not The Building

The Cenotaph chamber with marble screen. The point is why have an octagonal screen around two graves? It is more likely to have been an area of where sacred activities once took place.

[23/N]
Pre-Shahjahan References To The Taj :

Apparently the Taj as a central palace seems to have a controversial history The Taj was perhaps desecrated and looted by every Muslim invader from Mohammad Ghazni onwards

Shahjahan was the last Muslim to desecrate the Tajo Mahalaya
[24/N]
Mumtaz died in Burhanpur, which is about 600 miles from Agra. Her grave is there intact. Therefore, the cenotaphs raised in stories of the Taj in her name seem to be fakes hiding in Hindu Shiva emblems.

[25/N]
Forged Documents :

[26/N]
Carbon 14 Test - The Archaeological evidence

A wooden piece from the riverside doorway of the Taj subjected to the carbon 14 test by an American Laboratory by Prof Marvin Mills has revealed the door to be 300 years older than Shahjahan

[27/N]
Baseless Love Stories :

Shahjahan was married to several other women before and after Mumtaz.She, therefore, deserved no special consideration in having a wonder mausoleum built for her.

[28/N]
Where is Love ? ๐Ÿค”

Shahjahan Had 8 wives, some says Mumtaz was 2nd & Some as 4th

It's Clear that He Married after Mumtazโ€™s Death too, Mumtazโ€™s Died was in her 14th Pregnancy

Some Where I heard that Shahjahan Married Farzana Who was Mumtazโ€™s Younger Sister

[29/N]
I Feel like Still I have Not Finished This Thread. There May Be Part - 3 ๐Ÿ˜Š

๐Ÿ‘‰ Follow My Handles @TheRudra1008 & @TheAdiRudra1008 for more Threads

๐Ÿ‘‰ Subscribe to My Youtube Channel " Rudra Yagam" for Videos Related to Facts Dharma & History ๐Ÿ‘‡

https://t.co/3KDrjJo9nu

More from All

You May Also Like

I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.


Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel

He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:

He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:

He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party