It took me 3 years to beat inconsistency, I'll tell you how to in 2 minutes...

1. Never aim for perfection.

1% of progress daily is better than a perfect plan with no action.
2. Always embrace the small wins.

Reward yourself for the small victories as it will help you stay on track.
3. Small steps is the key.

I understand the need to take giant leaps towards goals/projects but if you inflate the ideas they become more daunting.
4. Go out and make mistakes.

They are important for you to grow.

Success is never without bumps along the road.
5. Plan with the end in mind.

Know what you are aiming for, that way you can visualise each step to get there.
6. Don't wait for the perfect time.

The best way to get something done is to begin.

No matter how the initial results are, you've taken a brave step.

One that many are scared to.
7. Believe in yourself.

Stop putting yourself under stress.

The Universe will guide you in the right direction!
8. Keep tally of all the actions you take.

At some point when the smaller steps compound, you will not want to break the streak you're on.
9. Remember to tell yourself:

• You can do this
• You are capable
• You are strong enough
• You are brave
• You can achieve everything you put your mind to.

You become your thoughts!
If you enjoyed this thread, please retweet the first tweet and follow me:

@Ant_Philosophy

I created this account to help:

• You become the best version of yourself.
• Provide inspiration and motivation.
• You learn alongside me on my journey.

Have an amazing day :)

More from All

Master Thread of all my threads!

Hello!! 👋

• I have curated some of the best tweets from the best traders we know of.

• Making one master thread and will keep posting all my threads under this.

• Go through this for super learning/value totally free of cost! 😃

1. 7 FREE OPTION TRADING COURSES FOR


2. THE ABSOLUTE BEST 15 SCANNERS EXPERTS ARE USING

Got these scanners from the following accounts:

1. @Pathik_Trader
2. @sanjufunda
3. @sanstocktrader
4. @SouravSenguptaI
5. @Rishikesh_ADX


3. 12 TRADING SETUPS which experts are using.

These setups I found from the following 4 accounts:

1. @Pathik_Trader
2. @sourabhsiso19
3. @ITRADE191
4.


4. Curated tweets on HOW TO SELL STRADDLES.

Everything covered in this thread.
1. Management
2. How to initiate
3. When to exit straddles
4. Examples
5. Videos on

You May Also Like

First thread of the year because I have time during MCO. As requested, a thread on the gods and spirits of Malay folk religion. Some are indigenous, some are of Indian origin, some have Islamic


Before I begin, it might be worth explaining the Malay conception of the spirit world. At its deepest level, Malay religious belief is animist. All living beings and even certain objects are said to have a soul. Natural phenomena are either controlled by or personified as spirits

Although these beings had to be respected, not all of them were powerful enough to be considered gods. Offerings would be made to the spirits that had greater influence on human life. Spells and incantations would invoke their


Two known examples of such elemental spirits that had god-like status are Raja Angin (king of the wind) and Mambang Tali Arus (spirit of river currents). There were undoubtedly many more which have been lost to time

Contact with ancient India brought the influence of Hinduism and Buddhism to SEA. What we now call Hinduism similarly developed in India out of native animism and the more formal Vedic tradition. This can be seen in the multitude of sacred animals and location-specific Hindu gods
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?