So , I thought , if we create multiple entries in different times in the same day , there is some time , when market consolidate & it gives us good profits.
(2/n)
A simple INTRADAY strategy with decent BACKTEST report of more than 3-5% returns on Monthly basis.
Will be sharing live report on daily basis for a month.
& will conduct FREE webinar to discuss about the results in coming weeks.
Sharing all rules below.
(1/n) https://t.co/VMlxNtX90s
Will be sharing one INTRADAY STRATEGY in BNF option selling with RULES on
— OptionSeller(Vardhan) (@CaVardhanCa) August 12, 2021
INDEPENDENCE DAY!!! 11 AM.
Do Backtest/Paper Trade/Understand & can Execute if you like.
Retweet for Max Reach & Stay Tuned.
So , I thought , if we create multiple entries in different times in the same day , there is some time , when market consolidate & it gives us good profits.
(2/n)
& if market does V shape recovery, then also this strategy perform good as options are OTM & not STRADDLES .
As per Backtest , recovery of 1-1.2% from lows will not give loss.
(3/n)
More from All
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".