Gerald and brother Ronnie Chan co founded this Morningside foundation, they are beholden to Beijing.

It seems Anderson and his Scripps Research Institute have some highly powerful and influential Chinese Communist Party members/sympathizers on their board of directors.

2) Some background,

Ronnie Chan is also the governor of the China-United States Exchange Foundation.

This entity happens to be registered as a foreign agent.
It is chaired by Tung Chee-hwa, vice-chairman of Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.
3) In 2018 the University of Texas at Austin rejected funding from the Hong Kong-based foundation CUSEF ,citing its links to the Chinese Communist Party.

https://t.co/elapRnFsrc
4) "CUSEF is a registered foreign agent bankrolled by a high-ranking Chinese government official with close ties to a sprawling Chinese Communist Party apparatus that handles influence operations abroad, known as the united front.”
https://t.co/7NiJyfAv0C
5) Here you can see exactly their political alignment...
In an interview with Bloomberg, Ronnie Chan also co-chair of the @AsiaSociety and Hang Lung property group chief - said that those banned from #HongKong elections were "asking for it."

https://t.co/L2fvqEzQoB
6) Joshua Wong :
“Asia Society's Hong Kong chapter that Ronnie Chan co-chaired has long been slammed for censorship and political screening in the city”

https://t.co/OsprFaKSBy
7) “rather than an ordinary businessman,Chan has close ties with Beijing authority”
Wong on whether Chan's decisions to build connections to U.S. universities while suppressing dissent at home are linked
“People wonder if Chan plays a role in China's global propaganda campaign”
8)The NBA?
"The events highlight Ronnie Chan’s role within a broader push by Beijing authorities to exert control over speech not only at home but abroad — ranging from blacklisting and expelling foreign journalists, to pressuring the NBA"
https://t.co/JpUoK2y2vF
9) It's just Philanthropy from a science enthusiast.
Just relax and don't pay any attention to those shell companies guys.
10) Its raining yuan, hallelujah.

How do you manage to get a school of public health at Harvard named after the family?
11) So the NBA and Harvard caved to the will of these supervillains, how about the Department of Immunology and Microbiology at Scripps Research?

https://t.co/92SXlkJSvy
12) Bonus gaslighting

“This is the same school of public health that defended 2+2=5,”

"The T.H. Chan School of Public Health at Harvard University experts praised full-scale Chinese-inspired lockdowns"

.

https://t.co/SCBv2SpRpJ

More from All

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x