[ Thread ]
[ Marriage , Rape & Consent ]

Marriage :

Since thousands of years this Institution has been part of domestic & social Life of human beings.

It had a legal defination to itself .
But since modernism ( late 1940s ) , It has started to changes .

One of the reasons

Is second wave feminism .
Earlier Marriage contract itself was the legal consent to sexual intercourse between the couple.

Respecting/Asking the will of the partner was no more than a " moral thing "

This is fairly starting to change since 90s as people now advocate that +++
"Consent for marriage Is not consent for S*x "

B ) Consent : It is asking the will of other partner before Indulging Into S*x

Before 40s : It was given In marriage contract .

Now : Modern Activists say it should be Acquired ( legally ) before S*x everytime.
C ) Rape :

The meaning of “rape” has also changed with the times, as it now means any forced sexual intercourse even within marriage. The reason for this change is that Western legal traditions shifted the basis of lawful sexual relations from contract to consent.
The marriage contract alone originally made " sexual relations lawful" , but now it is consent that legalizes sexual relations. This gave rise to the concept of [ marital rape ] and has influenced the legal discourse around the World .
Rape has always been meant something " Unlawful Intercourse " by force & against the will of person.

Ie the Issue of "marital rape" Isn't understood by most people . as It requires the original Defination of marriage & rape Itself to change !
Earlier the forceful Intercourse without consent of partner came under criminal law of "domestic sexual assault/wife harming" Ie it was conceived that a man has to harm her wife so as to have S*x against her will .

It was " harm principle " In place to punish the culprit .
Now It's not the "harm" that determines it but the lack of will . It was also easier to convict some of doing harm as it's clearly visible .

But with Marital r*pe , the discourse revolves around how to determine someone was willing or not.

Because it's a close-door matter +++
Betn two people ( No 3rd person eyewitness ) & that too Inherent to Individual's Inner desire/will . It's a very nuanced subject .

Nevertheless USA , UK & many western countries now has marital r*pe laws .
to prevent the women domestic abuse & abuse of her rights .
***
Note :

People discussion this topic on twitter needs to understand before labelling anyone of r*pe defenders etc. that ur coming up with a New concept of marriage , r*pe & consent in it .

Have a healthy discussion .
Explain your point in a Civi manner

[[ END ]]
Some Muslim women bombarded a fellow Muslima with vile abuses last night for taking a jibe at the concept of "Con. to M is not Con. for S " .

Instead of explaining it's meaning & Importance .

Most people did it just coz others were doing it & to look "cool".
Pathetic !!

More from All

You May Also Like

The first ever world map was sketched thousands of years ago by Indian saint
“Ramanujacharya” who simply translated the following verse from Mahabharat and gave the world its real face

In Mahabharat,it is described how 'Maharishi Ved Vyasa' gave away his divine vision to Sanjay


Dhritarashtra's charioteer so that he could describe him the events of the upcoming war.

But, even before questions of war could begin, Dhritarashtra asked him to describe how the world looks like from space.

This is how he described the face of the world:

सुदर्शनं प्रवक्ष्यामि द्वीपं तु कुरुनन्दन। परिमण्डलो महाराज द्वीपोऽसौ चक्रसंस्थितः॥
यथा हि पुरुषः पश्येदादर्शे मुखमात्मनः। एवं सुदर्शनद्वीपो दृश्यते चन्द्रमण्डले॥ द्विरंशे पिप्पलस्तत्र द्विरंशे च शशो महान्।

—वेद व्यास, भीष्म पर्व, महाभारत


Meaning:-

हे कुरुनन्दन ! सुदर्शन नामक यह द्वीप चक्र की भाँति गोलाकार स्थित है, जैसे पुरुष दर्पण में अपना मुख देखता है, उसी प्रकार यह द्वीप चन्द्रमण्डल में दिखायी देता है। इसके दो अंशो मे पीपल और दो अंशो मे विशाल शश (खरगोश) दिखायी देता है।


Meaning: "Just like a man sees his face in the mirror, so does the Earth appears in the Universe. In the first part you see leaves of the Peepal Tree, and in the next part you see a Rabbit."

Based on this shloka, Saint Ramanujacharya sketched out the map, but the world laughed
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?