I have read through the grooming report from the Home Office.
Here, in this thread, I will take you through the mathematical hoops they have jumped through in this deeply flawed analysis.
Thread 👇
It is, quite literally, a whitewash. It uses all the standard statistical tricks to avoid concluding a stark and glaring conclusion, which is otherwise plain to see. That there was a sustained, targeted and focussed attack by Pakistani men on white working class and Sikh girls.
**Choose limited data points**
One way to force a conclusion is to only range over a small and carefully chosen set of data points. In this case, the report used a limited number of use cases which largely ignored the high profile grooming gangs of Pakistani origin.
Only Rotherham was considered in earnest, as it could hardly be ignored as the start of it all.
A typical data trick is to only use one troublesome dataset - generally the most high profile one. This gives plausible denial on accusations of manipulation of source data.
_This is what we call “the domain trick”_