BillyBostickson Authors Dog's Breakfast
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
Evidence of Genetic Engineering of SARS-COV-2. Part 2 (thread).
The Outlandish Case of the Uncanny HIV Inserts.
Part 1 is below if you haven't yet read it:
https://t.co/CeztISvFQN
Early on in the pandemic a group of Indian HIV researchers announced they had found fragments of HIV in the SARS-COV-2 genome. While each fragment was small, they *rightly* stated that finding them all together was no coincidence.
https://t.co/vlAXv8UOKC
For their efforts they were slammed by other scientists and media, and on Feb 2, 2019, the day after the Fauci teleconference with Holmes, Andersen, Farrar et al, they withdrew their pre-print.
One of those sequences will be very familiar to anyone who has been following the story carefully. Although there has been a deletion within, Insert 4 is an easily recognizable part of the sequence around the SARS-COV-2 S1/S2 junction - QTNSPRRA.
It seems that these sequences have been taken from HIV and inserted into SARS-COV-2 genome. But what are their purpose? And did they originate in HIV naturally, or are they also artificial origin?
The FCS sequence I said previously derives from N. Meningitidis. Was I wrong?
The Outlandish Case of the Uncanny HIV Inserts.
Part 1 is below if you haven't yet read it:
https://t.co/CeztISvFQN

Evidence of genetic engineering in SARS-COV- Thread
— Dog's Breakfast (@breakfast_dogs) November 7, 2021
While the "lab leak" theory of SARS-COV-2 is now acceptable, many scientists still claim there's no evidence that SARS-COV-2 was genetically engineered.
These scientists either haven't looked, or need their eyes checked... pic.twitter.com/Bzz3XcW48t
Early on in the pandemic a group of Indian HIV researchers announced they had found fragments of HIV in the SARS-COV-2 genome. While each fragment was small, they *rightly* stated that finding them all together was no coincidence.
https://t.co/vlAXv8UOKC

For their efforts they were slammed by other scientists and media, and on Feb 2, 2019, the day after the Fauci teleconference with Holmes, Andersen, Farrar et al, they withdrew their pre-print.

One of those sequences will be very familiar to anyone who has been following the story carefully. Although there has been a deletion within, Insert 4 is an easily recognizable part of the sequence around the SARS-COV-2 S1/S2 junction - QTNSPRRA.

It seems that these sequences have been taken from HIV and inserted into SARS-COV-2 genome. But what are their purpose? And did they originate in HIV naturally, or are they also artificial origin?
The FCS sequence I said previously derives from N. Meningitidis. Was I wrong?
