AnJamison's Categories
AnJamison's Authors
Latest Saves
Note. Bannon's trial was NOT about Jan 6th - he WILL face that trial too. This was about Bannon stupidly attempting to conceal his crimes
Let's do a quick Thread

First. Understand.. we know the 2 dozen organizers, plotters, planners of January 6th. They will ALL go to prison, for at least a decade, most for Life. Including the few who get plea bargains in the Grand #Flippathon
Bannon is one of original
Jan 6 plotters: going to prison
— Tomi T Ahonen Standing With Ukraine (@tomiahonen) July 22, 2022
Giuliani
Sidney Powell
Flynn
Bannon
Roger Stone
Don Jr
Eastman
Meadows
Ron Johnson
Gym Jordan
Mo Brooks
Perry
Gosar
Biggs
Hice
Babin
Harris
Gohmert
Marjorie Traitor Greene
Jenna Ellis
Navarro
Patrick Byrne
My Pillow Guy
Trump#Jan6thHearings pic.twitter.com/tKzLZWZfCy
But today Bannon's guilty conviction is a BONUS for us. He becomes literally the first of the January 6th ORGANIZERS to go to prison. And as a bonus, this is EXTRA time in prison Bannon serves, above and beyond his role in January 6th because of this attempt to conceal his crimes

Then consider what a catastrophic calamity this is for Bannon. He FEARS prison. He begged Trump for a pardon. He RECEIVED a pardon. And this he did AFTER his pardon, so his pardon does not shield Bannon from these new convictions, and prison time

Then look at Bannon's absurdly stupid destructive behavior during this trial. That is a public record. When his ACTUAL trial starts for January 6th, Bannon will have a history of defying the law - convicted twice - that is part of his record making his NEXT trial WORSE

First, some background. Reporters and editors are constantly making choices about who to speak with to get story ideas about what to cover, who to interview to describe a problem, who to interview to tell us about the universe of potential solutions.
Importantly, sources ultimately quoted in an article often played a vital role behind the scenes. Many people don’t realize that the people quoted in articles explaining what happened and what could be done about it are often the same people who brought the story to the reporter.
In this process, many reporters rely on police and allies (prosecutors, pro-police officials, punishment bureaucrats, consultants, and corporate profiteers) to decide which stories to cover and to tell us "the facts." But when you look across articles, the pattern is striking:
Let's take a look at a few examples from the New York Times. Here's one about "perceptions" of rising crime:
What do you notice?
— Alec Karakatsanis (@equalityAlec) April 8, 2022
\u201cPolice officials.\u201d
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Professor
\u201cthe Police department\u201d
\u201cthe police department\u201d
\u201cofficials\u201d
Chief of detectives
— 5/18/20 #GOPElectionFraud 1/
h/t @GOPisComplicit 2/
More coverage. Wow. 3/
This. Read the Denver Post piece. It is brazen. 4/
Good lord, when you read their comments, they are like, no big deal, totally not a crime to falsify voting data. Normalizing committing crimes with legalese.
— Luella Schmidt (@luellajschmidt) July 15, 2022
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them . . .”
The insurrection levied War against the United States.
.@joenbc: "It's treason. Donald Trump committed treason against the United States of America. And if you're wondering what January 6th is about, it's about treason." https://t.co/TzRxk1QtZw pic.twitter.com/YDhVApBaZp
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) July 12, 2022