Volume expansion in tasty bites will be due to new product additions, new geographical expansions due to Mars supply chain and distribution network and volume expansion in all those geographies.With current low turnover base growth could be huge in next 8-10 years.

There is big optionality of contract manufacturing for other Mars products or other big brands also built into this business.They have recently started contract mfg for keventers agro foods. They are also doing contract manufacturing for a big TV chef based out of UK.
The management of tasty bites has impeccable track record of execution and have a mega capex in process where they have already spent 30Cr and and additional 150 Cr they are going to spend. This should be sufficient to atleast triple their topline with my conservative estimates.
Mars group- The current promoters of Tasty Bites has an annual turnover of approximately 3 Lakh crores annually and is privately owned. It is amongst the top 10 richest families in the world.
They have a knack of building superb brands and scaling businesses.
Few of the top notch world famous brands owned by Mars.
Tasty bites has ample land in bhandgaon and all their capex atleast for next 6-8 years will be brownfield. Hence there is a possibility of huge operating leverage playing out here.
Just follow their twitter account to see the glimpse of how they are creating a brand.

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.