Hindcopper -- Support (SL) 135 was held.
More upside above 158.
Targets as given 200-212
#Hindcopper
Hindcopper cmp146+
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) July 6, 2021
Previous low 135 can be the SL for longs.
Possible short term bottom here CONFIRMATION ABOVE 158 for further upside https://t.co/iofvrn6l5b
More from Shivaji Vitthalrao🇮🇳
Thanks. Praj Industries perfect smart distribution. More weakness below 336. Rise to 355-365 can face selling pressure.
Below 336 I see 275 in few months as long as its trading below 388 on closing basis CMP 351. https://t.co/iMRpbTfOpU
Below 336 I see 275 in few months as long as its trading below 388 on closing basis CMP 351. https://t.co/iMRpbTfOpU
Your analysis and sl saved my time and some bucks otherwise I would've lost much bigger amount,
— lavish gadia (@gadia_lavish) August 10, 2021
Can you share your views on praj industry @shivaji_1983
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
