I propose that instead of being part of a scam, countries are doubling down on restrictions as a denial reaction to being scammed
More from Scam
So I feel the need to do this, in attempt to protect some people. I BELIEVE
@WARONRUGS
is scamming it’s following. They came from ASEAL, the group that was anti rug and ended up rugging. I shilled I am aware, I made concerns clear in a hope to protect my following and (1/?)
I am here to once again try and do this. Shappy one of the admins, dumps on all of you his following after loading his bag very early with projects they may or may not be paid to endorse. There have been examples of those projects for example, “just hodl” the (2/?)
project that followed ASEAL ended in a rug. The reason I know this for a fact is I have his wallet address. Shappy during the ASEAL admins days knew forced admins to verify their addresses. (3/?)
Shappy dumped all of his ASEAL tokens two days before the announcement that the liquidity was being drained. You can see my tweet here:
Video proof of Shappys dm and wallet:
@WARONRUGS
is scamming it’s following. They came from ASEAL, the group that was anti rug and ended up rugging. I shilled I am aware, I made concerns clear in a hope to protect my following and (1/?)
I am here to once again try and do this. Shappy one of the admins, dumps on all of you his following after loading his bag very early with projects they may or may not be paid to endorse. There have been examples of those projects for example, “just hodl” the (2/?)
project that followed ASEAL ended in a rug. The reason I know this for a fact is I have his wallet address. Shappy during the ASEAL admins days knew forced admins to verify their addresses. (3/?)
Shappy dumped all of his ASEAL tokens two days before the announcement that the liquidity was being drained. You can see my tweet here:
Eh if you\u2019re still in I would advise getting out. They have continued to do dumb things since I left and this is the worst. If you want to stay all power to you. $ASEAL https://t.co/8UM0UjgONj pic.twitter.com/OKBRYoaRTb
— Jack.MN\u22f0\xb7\u22f0 (@Arkeon_Vito) November 11, 2020
Video proof of Shappys dm and wallet:
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
