• A stock/index / underlying usually follows two phases; viz. Contraction & Expansion in a cyclical manner.
Do you wish to get in the stocks right before they explode, without spending hours to scan them manually?
With hacks to find the stocks before they have explosive moves:🧵
Collaborated with @AdityaTodmal
• A stock/index / underlying usually follows two phases; viz. Contraction & Expansion in a cyclical manner.
• After a quite/contraction phase the expansion phase follows, this is where most of the money is made for a trend follower.
• Like a lion which patiently waits to for its prey to make less movement before making a kill.
• Wait patiently for market to make a narrow range such that movement should be almost dead or within a very small range.
• After a range formation the range will be broken either oon upside which is called as Breakout (BO) or would be broken on the downside which is called as Breakdown (BD).
• NR Trading Strategy is a breakout based method that assumes that the price of the security trends up or down after a consolidation in a narrow range.
• NR days mark price contractions that often precede price expansions.
• NR pattern comes from Tony Crabel's book, Day Trading with Short Term Price Patterns & Opening Range Breakout.
• An NR4 pattern would be the narrowest range in four days, while an NR7 would be the narrowest range in seven days.
a) Screener only helps in cutting down the time by shortlisting the names.
b) However one has to go through the names individually and check the most promising ones.
c) Select the best four (maxmium) promising names.
e) Define your risk to 0.5%-1% of your capital per trade.
f) Not more than 3 trades a day.
https://t.co/M8J7SuNTZw
A set up which has a minimum Risk/Reward (R/R) of 1:4
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) October 2, 2022
This set up can be used for intraday, option selling, option buying, as well as investing.
Maximum profit strategy by Subasish Pani.
Bollinger band set-up: \U0001f9f5!
Collaborated with @AdityaTodmal pic.twitter.com/aEIUVQF2XY
If you enjoyed this thread:
1. Follow us
@AdityaTodmal
&
@niki_poojary
For more threads on Price action, Option Selling & Trading strategies.
We've got you covered.
2. RT the first Tweet to share it with your audience.
I appreciate it!
More from Nikita Poojary
In the month of November 2022, we have shared 9 threads, which includes:
• How to save taxes from trading income
- Individuals
- Corporate way
• Powerful Intraday set-up with screeners
• 12 rules for professional position players
and much more 🧵
1/ How to initiate a short straddle how to manage them with
2/ Things I know now, (after three years) post becoming a full - time
3/ How to reduce taxes by optiong for a Corporate
4/ Ten powerful intraday setups with
• How to save taxes from trading income
- Individuals
- Corporate way
• Powerful Intraday set-up with screeners
• 12 rules for professional position players
and much more 🧵
1/ How to initiate a short straddle how to manage them with
Short Straddle is the highest payoff strategy in Option Selling.
— Aditya Todmal (@AdityaTodmal) November 5, 2022
However, it comes with huge risks as well.
You become good at managing Straddles with adjustments.
Here's a step-by-step breakdown on them:
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
\U0001f9f5
2/ Things I know now, (after three years) post becoming a full - time
Things I know now that I wish I knew three years ago when I started trading.
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) November 5, 2022
Collaborated with @AdityaTodmal
\U0001f9f5
3/ How to reduce taxes by optiong for a Corporate
How to use a corporate account to lower taxes drastically
— Aditya Todmal (@AdityaTodmal) November 6, 2022
A comprehensive \U0001f9f5 :
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
4/ Ten powerful intraday setups with
10 most Powerful Intraday Setups with Screeners: \U0001f9f5
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) November 8, 2022
Collaborated with @AdityaTodmal
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
