🚨PA Absentee Ballot(AB) Irregularities Deep-dive🚨

ABs in PA - even if Biden received:
-95% of returned Democrat votes
-21% of returned Republican votes
-80% of returned Independent votes

He wouldn't have as many votes as he actually received

🕵️Investigation Needed🕵️

Read on

I've been consistent on this issue since Nov 4th

I just didn't know what the final vote breakdown of absentee ballots was until now

Biden's final total of 1,995,591 is virtually impossible to explain given the party affiliation of absentee ballot voters
https://t.co/W1r0dFTi7Z
Don't believe me, let's look at exit polls from election day (Washington Post)

Exit polls show Biden +85% among Democrats meaning

Democrat Voters in PA:
92.50% Biden vs 7.5% others

Let's say this is within the margin of error and 95% is plausible
https://t.co/G5L2eVygiG
The same exit polls show Trump +83% among Republicans meaning

Republican Voters in PA:
91.50% Trump vs 8.5% other

so 21% of Republicans voting for Trump is out of the question

Let's give Biden 11% of Republican ABs in case there was a margin of error in Trump's favor
The same exit poll on Independents

Biden by 51 percent to 43 percent for Trump

So there is no way Biden gets 80% of the Independent vote

Let's be nice and bump it up (😉) to 55% of Independents voting for Biden
So with this super favorable percentage of votes for Biden:
-95% of Democrat Absentee Ballots
-11% of Republican Absentee Ballots
-55% of Independent Absentee Ballots

He would still be -143K votes short of his actual total
But if we input WaPo's real exit poll data?

Biden is -213K vote shy of his actual total
Some may say that absentee ballot voters behave differently than day of election voters

The problem is that we are dealing with very large data sets here

The probability that 21% of Republicans and 80% of Independent voters would vote for Biden is outside the margin of error
But maybe you insist that there is just something about voting from home that makes both Republicans and Independents more likely to vote for Biden

Fair enough, but now you have to prove it - no "theories"

I've shown a clear irregularity that needs to be investigated
Or you can just use common sense and realize that this doesn't make sense

It's not a complicated analysis - anybody can do it

And I'm using Pennsylvania Secretary of State data for anybody that wants to check my numbers
But it's just one exit poll you may say

CNN exit polls confirm these numbers
https://t.co/2ZNCULPZQq
NY Times exit polls also confirm

https://t.co/EK1AJDDTvW
And ABC exit polls

https://t.co/HoPKueP7nx
And by NBC exit polls: https://t.co/gpY6ouNBla
And it gets worse!

These extra 100K-200K votes had to come from somewhere because the final votes needed to approximate the returned ballots

You can't add ballots out of thin air

This implies that these are ballots cast for other candidates and were flipped
You wanted proof, here it is

There is no way to harmonize the data from returned absentee ballots to Biden's 1,995,591 total absentee ballot votes

There's just no way Biden to have gotten 76% of returned absentee ballots in Pennsylvania

It should be clear for anybody to see
Final thought

Send out generic absentee ballots (like this one for PA) and you've made a mockery of election security

Only way forward is an immediate investigation to clarify why this blatant irregularity exists

That's it, please remember to RT the first tweet in this thread!
Jorgensen got 53,318 votes on election day

Not 500K+ as in the chart

But doesn’t affect the analysis in any way

Sorry for the typo
Fixed the error for Election Day votes for Jorgensen

Again, doesn't affect the analysis which is purely on absentee ballot votes

More from Politics

What does "patriots in control" mean?
What would that "look like" in reality?


So a massive adult film star in all his glory is included in an official FBI government filing


Hunter Biden's book is categorized as "Chinese


TIME admits to "conspiracy" to "not rig, rather


A "pillow guy" has military-grade intercepts detailing the IP addresses and device MAC IDs of EVERY incursion into every county in the
This idea - that elections should translate into policy - is not wrong at all. But political science can help explain why it's not working this way. There are three main explanations: 1. mandates are constructed, not automatic, 2. party asymmetry, 3. partisan conpetition 1/


First, party/policy mandates from elections are far from self-executing in our system. Work on mandates from Dahl to Ellis and Kirk on the history of the mandate to mine on its role in post-Nixon politics, to Peterson Grossback and Stimson all emphasize that this link is... 2/

Created deliberately and isn't always persuasive. Others have to convinced that the election meant a particular thing for it to work in a legislative context. I theorized in the immediate period of after the 2020 election that this was part of why Repubs signed on to ...3/

Trump's demonstrably false fraud nonsense - it derailed an emerging mandate news cycle. Winners of elections get what they get - institutional control - but can't expect much beyond that unless the perception of an election mandate takes hold. And it didn't. 4/

Let's turn to the legislation element of this. There's just an asymmetry in terms of passing a relief bill. Republicans are presumably less motivated to get some kind of deal passed. Democrats are more likely to want to do *something.* 5/

You May Also Like

🌺श्री गरुड़ पुराण - संक्षिप्त वर्णन🌺

हिन्दु धर्म के 18 पुराणों में से एक गरुड़ पुराण का हिन्दु धर्म में बड़ा महत्व है। गरुड़ पुराण में मृत्यु के बाद सद्गती की व्याख्या मिलती है। इस पुराण के अधिष्ठातृ देव भगवान विष्णु हैं, इसलिए ये वैष्णव पुराण है।


गरुड़ पुराण के अनुसार हमारे कर्मों का फल हमें हमारे जीवन-काल में तो मिलता ही है परंतु मृत्यु के बाद भी अच्छे बुरे कार्यों का उनके अनुसार फल मिलता है। इस कारण इस पुराण में निहित ज्ञान को प्राप्त करने के लिए घर के किसी सदस्य की मृत्यु के बाद का समय निर्धारित किया गया है...

..ताकि उस समय हम जीवन-मरण से जुड़े सभी सत्य जान सकें और मृत्यु के कारण बिछडने वाले सदस्य का दुख कम हो सके।
गरुड़ पुराण में विष्णु की भक्ति व अवतारों का विस्तार से उसी प्रकार वर्णन मिलता है जिस प्रकार भगवत पुराण में।आरम्भ में मनु से सृष्टि की उत्पत्ति,ध्रुव चरित्र की कथा मिलती है।


तदुपरांत सुर्य व चंद्र ग्रहों के मंत्र, शिव-पार्वती मंत्र,इन्द्र सम्बंधित मंत्र,सरस्वती मंत्र और नौ शक्तियों के बारे में विस्तार से बताया गया है।
इस पुराण में उन्नीस हज़ार श्लोक बताए जाते हैं और इसे दो भागों में कहा जाता है।
प्रथम भाग में विष्णुभक्ति और पूजा विधियों का उल्लेख है।

मृत्यु के उपरांत गरुड़ पुराण के श्रवण का प्रावधान है ।
पुराण के द्वितीय भाग में 'प्रेतकल्प' का विस्तार से वर्णन और नरकों में जीव के पड़ने का वृत्तांत मिलता है। मरने के बाद मनुष्य की क्या गति होती है, उसका किस प्रकार की योनियों में जन्म होता है, प्रेत योनि से मुक्ति के उपाय...
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.