If I were to point out that Pfizer's investigational medicines have not been approved by FDA I might get my account suspended, or have my content censored.

Pfizer is allowed to say it tho. Maybe they have to.
https://t.co/ip7Y2K9bll
https://t.co/FRIhUqWntb #CrimesAgainstHumanity

What's this? According to Pfizer's current public documentation, there is still insufficient data to "inform vaccine-related risks in pregnancy."

Someone better tell that to CDC. 😬

"Tho the spike shares an amino acid sequence with placenta, they're different, & distinct.⁵" 🤔
What's that little ⁵ there?

Oh, it's the "Exaptation of Retroviral Syncytin for Development of Syncytialized Placenta, Its Limited Homology to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and Arguments against Disturbing Narrative in the Context of COVID-19 Vaccination"
https://t.co/uJ1c5USYGk
"Arguments against Disturbing Narrative," huh. 🤨

I wonder which "disturbing narrative" they might be talking about.

Maybe this one. 🤷‍♂️
https://t.co/Zy2x0bfs3V
That is disturbing. I hope they have some good arguments against it. Let's take a look.

Not looking particularly convincing so far tbh. 😬
"The empirical bioinformatic studies showed that the protein pairs which share 8 amino acid identities, but not > 35% identity over 80 amino acid stretches, are not cross-reactive. [75]"

"empirical bioinformatic studies" 🤨

"are not"🤔

Maybe we'd better have a look at [75]. 🧐
75 👉 https://t.co/2R3MDN3UM3

Everything we've read down this Pfizer rabbit hole is based on this, apparently.
The spike and placenta only share 4 out of 100 pairs of amino acids. So although they look almost identical, they're really just a teeny tiny bit identical.

That's totally okay, right? What harm could four lil amino acids do?

I'm sure they have good evidence that this is fine🤞
Let's break down what 4/100 means.

8x2 base pairs x 4 of 100 amino acids are the same

That means there are 64 identical sequences between spike & syncytin.

Syncytin is integral in the development of placenta, which is integral to reproduction.

And the evidence this is fine?🤨
"IgE-binding epitopes may consist of short contiguous amino-acid stretches," but it "is believed" that they need more than 64 of them to bind.

Well that's a relief, it is *believed* that this is probably fine.

Remember, this is what Pfizer is basing "different and distinct" on.
"Expert opinion rather than experimental evidence." 😐

And who are these experts who say this is fine with no evidence?

Dow employees. Dow employees working on transgenic crops.

Based on what?

Pure fucking conjecture.

But go ahead pregnant ladies, CDC says this is fine. 😬👌
Although this document is posted without a date, you know it is the most current, updated info from Pfizer because they note that the EUA is good for "individuals 12 years of age and older," since the FDA only just lowered the age to twelve recently, within the last couple weeks.
https://t.co/xbk7s8OdJ1

You May Also Like