Sharing, what I think, are some useful layouts for
@tradingview

Market Analysis: I use this as a short-term breadth indicator. Clean chart with % Stocks Above Below MAs Indicator below. Indicator can be moved to any MA and also between SPX, QQQ etc.

https://t.co/sDMNov2U60

$SPX Stocks above 20,50 & 200 MA
https://t.co/K8G9KzyizA
New Highs vs Lows: New Highs vs Lows in the Market. If you compare the new lows emerging with major tops in the market you can see warning signs emerge. https://t.co/25n3nBPBSB
$QQQ Stocks above 20, 50 & 200 MA https://t.co/0geRTmSXn1
Finally, here is my standard trading layout h/t to @taplot as I shamelessly emulated his layout and use many of the scripts that he generously released.
https://t.co/EzHDmvaztS
If you find these helpful then give them a like and a retweet. Thanks. All are freely available indicators on @tradingview platform.

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?